Technically more advanced graphics does not automatically equal a better looking game and I'm tired of people acting...

Technically more advanced graphics does not automatically equal a better looking game and I'm tired of people acting like it does.

Attached: 1643418313811m.jpg (889x1024, 210.59K)

okay

Like crispfags who pretend the devs made SNES games intended for them to look crisp and pixelated.

yeah that looks gross

Bottom looks better though.
I don't care what anyone says, render96 looks fucking cool as fuck.

Main issue is that one texture that is just wood shavings when zoomed out. Now replace that with a texture that actually works and it will look better at scale.

Do you really think the mountain is supposed to be made of wood shavings you dumb fuck

>change the artstyle
>blame muh graphics
Nice one, nintardio.

It would still look like shit because Mario 64 is a low poly game with basic primitive early 3d visuals. HD textures will look out of place no matter what.

doesn't matter it still looks better