Fact: Influence, popularity & historical context is irrelevant when discussing the quality of a video game...

Fact: Influence, popularity & historical context is irrelevant when discussing the quality of a video game, it's only used because of unhealthy fanboys having emotional attachments to products that they otherwise can't explain why they are good. This game is a good example of unhealthy fanboy cultism, constantly propped up as a "Flawless game" from fanboys. People will claim other older games didn't age well but contradict themselves by circlejerking other archaic garbage

Attached: index.png (240x210, 7.52K)

didn't read + you're a fag + ratio

OoT is still better than 99% of all retail console games ever made even without its context and influence

This post is extremely low quality.

And it gets shit on nonstop while alttp gets rated higher despite the developers themselves claiming Link’s Awakening was better

>Make a irrefutable argument
>NPC’s prove his point by being unable to argue it and respond with buzzwords like the cultists they are
Tetris is the most overrated game ever made by far

it's worse than any souls game due to bad combat, enemies, bosses, etc, desu but you're still right

Attached: download.jpg (1024x1082, 267.27K)

>Influence means nothing
>Popularity means nothing
>How many games it inspired means nothing
>All that matters determines quality is how much you personally enjoyed it.
This statement is shared in every form of medium EXCEPT video games for some reason, i have no idea why video game fans are so deranged & mentally ill.

So you agree that Puyo Puyo is a better designed puzzle game?

Attached: 564551516623732736.gif (82x92, 17.63K)

>invent mechanic
>thousands of people copy it
>without changing at all, original game is somehow made objectively worse because it's a common mechanic

Yes. Any puzzle game is better than Tetris because it’s just moving blocks, it’s no different than Candy Crush or any other mobile game & nobody would care about it if it wasn’t made by Russians

Nobody gives a single fuck what influence it had. That’s absolutely irrelevant to how good the game is in 2022 compared to any of it’s contemporaries in the puzzle genre

OP made this thread because he was malding at a bait thread that called his favorite game overrated

>Simple puzzle games are bad because... THEY JUST ARE, OKAY?!?
This whole thread feels like a cope by a gaming journo who's shit review was laughed at.

Take your meds schizo

Seems he hit the nail on the head.

You are 100% in the right. Were you in the thread the other day?

I give a fuck, checkmate :^)

Journalists are the only people who continually have been shilling Tetris as a masterpiece for the last 30 years

Fpbp
OP sounds like an uptight fag who got btfo in an argument and had to write an essay about why he thinks he's right about everything

Agree, i could probably make a thread about let's say Ocarina of Time or Castlevania SOTN and get no push back if i shat on them for being overrated. Tetris is one of the few that despite nobody able to even say why they liked it still being blindly shilled to high heaven

what's the actual flaw in tetris

What's a flaw in pong or Pac-Man?

what's the actual flaw in pong, pacman, flappy bird, fucking any simple game? that theyre too simple and boring

In the original? The lack of wall bump and the tetromino rng being kinda dumb, iirc.

zoom zoom hive mind

>You are stupid and nostalgic if you cling to games because of their historical context and I look down on you if you can't explain why they're good
>But when I call a game shit, I won't bother giving any explanation
OP, please, stop shitposting, leave your mom's basement and never return to the internet.
Ever.
I'm serious, the internet sucks because of cancer like you.