Why aren't men equally as sexualized as women are in vidya?

Define what you mean by sexualization. Because there absolutely are a shitload of handsome guys who flirt and look conventionally attractive in vidya

Why is bara shit so absolutely vile? It makes me want to vomit.

it's the same hyper exaggerated features you enjoy in str*ight porn

this image is unsettling

damn I should lift

play warframe if you want to drown in sexy gay men

Attached: nezha sandwitch.jpg (811x625, 82.61K)

Just like how hentai exaggerate breast sizes and hips, bara media exaggerate pec sizes and asses.

I have 500GB of gay porn

Attached: 4840.jpg (325x497, 17.77K)

men they are sexualized almost as much as women
but women beauty inspires spiteful jealousy and envy while male beauty inspires bodily ambition and self improvement

Attached: 1273866941061.jpg (450x338, 21.85K)

prove it

Because as opposed to men, women have relatively few reasons to exist apart from sexuality.

Attached: 1596861031250.jpg (972x710, 107.84K)

You gays are fucked in the brain, they look like meat balloon abominations, they aren't even human looking.

Primary function of the male body is function over form.

Female attraction to male bodies is largely decided by how how well structured the male body in question is to perform. Thats why women respond more to erotic suggestion then flat out showing off a man's body. Additionally, function is attained by work, which requires drive and determination. You cant cheat a properly built male form. Its an indicator of leadership potential.

The female body is all about form over function. Its design is to attract attention and largely out of the control of the woman (outside unnatural means such as plastic surgery, or hyperactive use of makeup to the point of painting rather than "making up"). To this end women cannot naturally do anything about their bodies besides take care of them (do not bring up things like breasts swelling during pregnancy as an example. That happens after attracting a male and relationship formation). Thus the logic behind this is that what women can work on is their personality. Perfecting their character and skills to prepare to be a compliment to their mate someday, as they understand they are the less capable gender for work. They are the gender capable of rearing and their strength lies there.

Anyway back to the original question. Men's bodies are not sexualizied because to sexualize something would imply displaying a body with its "beautiful" attributes in prominent display in a unique enough way to grab and hold attention. That is the objective of a woman's body and thus any attempt to do so to a males body, by either fujos or fags, both of whom are mentally ill, is by trying to apply womanly attributes to a stereotypically top percentage male body.

(1/2)

(2/2)

Things like clear skin, exaggerated roundness, certain posing tricks and skewing proportions just enough to trigger clues and hints that are normally reserved for males looking for healthy females, but since its on a man, its considered sexualized...mostly to coomer women and fags. Anyone else who views such drawings is naturally disgusted or unimpressed.

I myself had no interest in this thread but think a lot about how people's minds work and how and why they percieve things the way they do. I've done some research on the topic, but mostly my own rumination. I see this dumb question clogging up the board every so often and usually ignore it, but this time I felt compelled to answer it. My own fault, and I accept the consequences, which is likely going to be a lot of subzero IQ responses.