Why is Nintendo so overcredited and overvauled in the history of vidya?
Why is Nintendo so overcredited and overvauled in the history of vidya?
Kayden Scott
Blake Baker
The Simpson's may have done it first, but it doesn't mean they did it better.
Thomas Bailey
Because they're still in business unlike half these fuckin companies so naturally people still celebrate shit they did?
I know this is just another dipshit consolewar faggotry thread but come on. This is basic marketing.
Evan Brown
It's amazing nearly all of these are just flat out wrong
Dylan Murphy
some of these are technically correct but the infograph neglects to mention the fact that sometimes nintendo literally just fucking did it better which is why they end up getting most of the credit. the fucking atari 5200 controller is not worth praising :(
David Wood
Tendies are a demented cult. This is coming from someone whose first console was an NES and who owns a Switch.
Ayden Ramirez
Tomb raider didnt have lock on targeting, it had auto aim. If you could lock onto something you could stand still and strafe it without shooting
Hudson James
By your retard definition Kingdom Hearts doesn't have lock on.
Michael Wood
name a single thing in the tomb raider games you can lock onto that you dont shoot
Grayson Lopez
>if you can't lock on to things you can't attack then it's not lock on
Damn, DMC doesn't have lock on. I never knew. Thanks for enlightening me, OoToddler bro.
Jack Cook
you didnt answer the question
Connor Cox
First off, that wasn't a question. Second off, your arbitrary criteria of being able to lock onto things that you don't attack is not relevant to actual lock on mechanics, nor is your attempt at defining it via giving the player the ability to strafe. Trying to change the definition won't make you less wrong. There's a reason only retarded game journalists from the 90s pretended OoT invented lock on. These are also the kinds of retards that thought Zelda was an rpg series.
David Garcia
>your definition of "being able to lock onto things" is irrelevant even though you cant actually lock on to anything except enemies
Caleb Lewis
I can't tell if this is a joke or if it's actual retardation. No, you don't need to be able to lock onto things other than enemies for a game to have lock on.
Jason Martin
most of these aren't even widely claimed to have been done by nintendo first to begin with and are just there to pad the list
Brody Cooper
Tomb Raider doesn't have lock-on targeting, it has shitty auto-aim that you have to hope targets the enemy that presents the most immediate threat when they're grouped together.
Adam Bennett
gotcha, so never mind the fact that you dont even press a button to do it or anything, and that you dont even look at the target when your shooting it unless its directly in front of you, its totally the same thing
Cameron Walker
Who the fuck thinks Nintendo invented the dual-analog controller? Everyone knows about the DualShock.
William Powell
nintendo invented video games why would they not be valued
Ryan Brooks
>invents exclusives by illegally threatening third parties if they sell on other platforms
Connor Campbell
It's a shitposting image at its very core. And the only reason it even remotely passes as otherwise is because none of the images shows the products they're citing.
If you flipped the text and images with each other no one would ever buy it.
Leo Clark
You mean to tell me the Matell Intellivision's numeric pad wasn't actually a d-pad? Crazy