Why don't they make 87.5% male pokemon look like it?

Why don't they make 87.5% male pokemon look like it?

Attached: tumblr_pmuhzuopAp1y1n7jjo1_1280.png (1000x1000, 363.49K)

Attached: giphy (44).gif (320x253, 2.52M)

Because sissy's exist

Attached: Sissy fags.jpg (1564x1564, 736.52K)

because (you) bought it anyway

Please don't use that term, it's derogatory. Same with "femboy". Say "tomgirl" instead.

Sex

It's pronounced "cissy" and we don't allow that here.

Attached: tumblr_pngt4fTH1p1y1n7jjo1_1280 (1).png (1000x1000, 453.12K)

Shut up , faggot

Because you naively look at sexual dimorphism like a human.

Name one (1) male animal without a penis-shaped nose.

It's a fictional, animal-like creature, not a human being.

You people will never get over it huh?

they are gay

Attached: 1617805641228.jpg (783x923, 140.14K)

well because the 87.5% male pokemon doesnt actually mean its primary gender its just saying the pokemon is "rare" Fossils,Zorua,Riolu,Togepi,eevee,starters etc etc

Because pokemon is a game for trans people

Why didn't God make male animals look like it?

Attached: 764-962.jpg (668x1000, 241.19K)

Why are starters mostly male anyway

artificial scarcity to limit breeding (the game doesn't tell you can breed male x ditto)

They also limit ditto to mid/late game appearances, further adding a barrier to breeding starters.

Then why make feminine starters
They went full retard with chikorita and it was all downhill from there on

Anteater