I found this picture on Google. It's based on the Pokemon Gotcha video where Selene and Lillie were dancing together.
It's definitely well-made and almost looks like official material...but also looks a wee bit too sexual if you ask me? Specifically, Selene's shorts seem to be a bit too short, and Lillie's skirt also a bit too short. Now officially they are also pretty short so perhaps I'm overthinking, but I was wondering what others thought of this picture.
Do you think this Selene and Lillie picture looks innocent or too sexual?
Brandon Roberts
Other urls found in this thread:
Justin Clark
this fucking board...
Aiden Wood
SEX
Andrew Murphy
What? I'm just wondering if I'm overthinking or the picture is indeed too sexual.
Easton White
sexual.
if you are looking for wallpappers just choose something simple or super stylistic
Jaxon Rogers
So it does have sexual vibes? It's not just me?
Luis Perez
Aha. So it's not just me. It does have sexual vibes. And yeah, simple or super stylistic seems like the way to go. Thanks.
Andrew White
she's laughing at how bad I'm begging her to stomp on my flaccid dick and it's so hot
Dominic Baker
You are extremely autistic but also correct. The artist draws porn.
Adam Morgan
>but I was wondering what others thought
my thought is you're to autistic.
John Reyes
No need to call me autistic. That kind of figures though. Out of curiosity, who is the original artist?
Easton Powell
It's clearly suggestive and you'd have to be autistic to not see it:
>exposed midriff, outline of ass crack and taint region on chicken chan
>barely-there skirt on lillie
>general composition/angle of the drawing helps to put emphasis on these things
Compare this to official art of someone like Nessa, who you'd think would be hard to draw in a non-suggestive way.
Ryder Walker
You are beyond help. Use your autistic eyes.
Hudson Sanchez
Artist is TER. Mainly draws exhibitionism so nothing too hardcore.
Benjamin Reyes
You most definitely have autism but you are very polite so I will throw you the Twitter page twitter.com
Jaxson Watson
>two young girls dancing
There's no way to not make it sexual. Pagan filth.
Brody Roberts
Anything that involves Selene is sexual to me
Leo Reed
She is sex incarnate.
Easton Edwards
>peeks
Jesus...
Samuel Phillips
You're asking the wrong place, OP. Any Forums will sexualize anything, even the most innocent things. I bet some coombrain here would get a boner from OO just because it looks like breasts. Pathetic.
Nolan Murphy
I could easily stroke myself to completion with this.
Juan Lee
( . Y . )
Ethan Flores
Coombait images exist on a spectrum. Coomers have a lower threshold for what they consider fappable, but the actual standards used to judge aren't actually that different.
In other words, OP still shouldn't be considering putting that picture up at his office or some shit to show people he likes Pokemon, because that's not going to be the takeaway from most people.