>so bland Any Forums would rather UOHHHpost about the boy rather than her
That is a fall-off if there ever was one.
So bland Any Forums would rather UOHHHpost about the boy rather than her
That's because she's identical to the boy.
UOHHH high socks on child legs
this, it's the same character just with pigtails
I don't understand this zoomerspeak. Can anyone translate OP for me?
he's by far way cuter
gaywads/women are way less annoying then coomers so I see this a decent compromise
Yes. so?
Why did they go this route if customization was going to be limited anyways?
Go back to twitter
>Anyone more annoying than women
Yeah, I'm thinking you gotta go back
>faggots and troons have irredeemable shit taste and will latch on to anything as long as they are the target audience
>heteroCHADs will rightfully ignore garbage character designs
news at 11
She’s a lame ass looking nigga. That’s all there is to it
but this is Twitter. i can't write over 200 characters and it also has Reddit rules
>the pedophiles in here are sexualizing the underage boy instead of the underage girl which is even worse than usual
That's what happens when you normalize gays. Blame your stupid politicians for enabling this phenomenon
Fake news
Blame your race for being a faggot and LGBT by genetics that reproduce solely through rape.
You don't even know my race
pokémon lolifags can afford to be picky. shotafags don't have that luxury
Don't spread misinformation, it's clothing customization what's being cut down while expanding facial customization
So the traits that get shotacons excited about a clean cut young boy don't tend to be the same traits that get lolicons excited.