Yeah bro remember when Pokémon didn't look like Digimon?

Yeah bro remember when Pokémon didn't look like Digimon?

Attached: GridArt_20220907_233125345.jpg (4096x2302, 1.06M)

Neither of those look like Digimon

>that color saturation power creep in the past few gens
Jesus Christ. Are GF's designers color blind or something?

Attached: Garudamon_tri.png (428x509, 61.46K)

They could pass for megaman bosses.

i dont see it, digimon are detailed with good anatomy not this crap from discovery kids

That is not following Digimon design rules. It's way too smooth and featureless.

Attached: oversaturation.png (1000x2805, 586.71K)

>You have to keep using the exact same art style for 20 years.
Never mind that the actual sprites in gen 3 were every bit as saturated as that new artwork.

Pokemon designs since gen 1 where shit. All of them. From gen 1 to gen 9.

You dont know what artstyle means.

I mean yea, Blaziken still has animal qualities like claws and feathers.

Attached: blaziken.png (80x84, 1.72K)

Color palette is part of art style. This is a fact, and your low-functioning ass "agreeing" with it or not is irrelevant.

Yeah, I remember 1996-present.

Then they should update the Gen 1-6 Sugimori artwork to be in a consistent art style as Gen 7-9.

No? Why would they do that, retard? These aren't game assets.

They look just as stupid as Hitmonchan, and Hitmonchan is a stupid looking Pokemon

Holy shit can you guys be consistent for 5 minutes. For years vp was complaining about the 3D models having undersaturated and washed out colors

For marketing and branding purposes.

No one brought up 3D models.

These are both cool and so are digimon