bipedalism is the curse of pokemon
Bipedalism is the curse of pokemon
shut up
bipedalism is fine as long as it's not blatantly humanoid
Oh the fucking horror.
Bipedalism is fine as long as it's meant as a biped from the start*
There's a clear gap between 4-legged mons and their last bipedal stage, where they also lose their main personality and are worse than the middle stage
but nidoking and slowbro are some of the greatest pokemon ever made
Its much worse in digimon
translation:
>I'm a fat fetishist so it's fine when they're fat
shut up
Obstagoon will always be a disgusting abomination
>MONSTER BAD
>FEWER MOVES BAD
>INTERESTING DESIGN BAD
>ME WANT CARTOON ANIMALS
that Obstagoon looks great
I agree and am also partial to Rhydon
for me the issue with (for example) Incineroar isn't the bipedality per se, I just don't like the design
YO WAR OF THE MONSTERS WAS THE BEST!
>>MONSTER BAD
we like monsters though
>FEWER MOVES BAD
This arguement doesn't even make ense, unless you ment FEWER MOVE GOOD. Exceot They gave a Fish Close Combat you absolute retard. Movepools have nothing to due to being humanoid and everything to do with whether or not something a a shillmon or from KANTOOOOOOOOOOOO
>INTERESTING DESIGN BAD
Furrsuits aren't interesting
>>ME WANT CARTOON ANIMALS
No we don't stop being retarded
bragging about 8 bipedals / 48 positions (8 generations, 6 first positions) lmao this image debunks itself
idk I kinda like the cartoon animals
>we like monsters though
No you don't.
>Exceot They gave a Fish Close Combat you absolute retard
Cool now show me how to use Close Combat or any punch move on the eeveelutions.
>Cool now show me how to use Close Combat or any punch move on the eeveelutions.
how me how a fish does it
Obviously a victim to covid
Not really. It's good even, as long as pokemon shapes are balanced. But we unfortunately have more and more focus on humanoid shapes lately.