Why wasn't NYC ruined by cars the way some cities were?
Why wasn't NYC ruined by cars the way some cities were?
Other urls found in this thread:
Niggers can't afford them
it was designed before cars you moron, most cities are newer than cars. NYC was unstoppable so the slave owning jews in the south forced their farm equipment into the north in the 1940s-1950s to wage biological war on the northern cities.
Oklahoma City was also designed before cars and they absolutely gutted that city just to get some highways in
Have you ever been there??
It was, you've just never been to Europe and seen a city that wasn't ruined by cars, so you think NYC being ruined by them to a lesser extent is breathtaking.
supposedly because of transit infrastructure. But transit is actual shit, so nobody wants to take the train, but driving is a nightmare so your choice is to either get harassed by hobos on a delayed train or spend twice as long driving and have to tip every time someone breaks into your car
go ride your bike, faggot
They tried
what do you mean?
NYC was far more developed for far longer.
Many beautiful buildings in cities all over were torn down for highways and freeways. Uglifying the country
go drive on the cross-bronx or bqe sometime
Every.
Fucking.
Time.
There was pretty much no undeveloped land in Brooklyn or Manhattan by the time Cars became affordable for the average person.
The Bronx and Queens were built with cars in mind in the 20s-30s, but didn't have much room for freeways by the 50s.
The lack of space for highways combined with the City's ability to keep niggers out of the nicer parts of town (at least for a few decades longer than a lot of other cities) meant that there was no demand for large highways or cars.
What the fuck. What a disaster.
NYC is fucking horrible for cars.
Public transportation is also horrible because of diversity
I've never been more angry driving than when I was driving in NYC
No one wants to drive through NYC
It smells like piss and garbage
and is filled with sodomites and kikes
Subway and bus are good despite people always talk shit on them. Also the city is so much more dense than a sprawling city (like phoenix) that you can quickly get to where you need to go
Because yankland NIMBY retardation did not infect cities created before it appeared as a trend.
It's sad really that the post war prosperity that made burgerland a beacon of freedom to the world also fucked them into polarizing themselves so much in some things.
The usa lacks middle level housing, it has big towers at city centres and commercial areas and beautiful mc mansions at suburbs but there is 0 literally 0 new middle level real estate aka 3 to 12 levels appartment buildings, the only ones that remain seem to be 100 year old crackhouses in abandoned industrial areas.
It's probably due to cheap energy and the post war prosperity but if that shit does not change asap the us will be in trouble if energy goes higher.
>If Any Forums chuds got their way
This is why you are all souless poors in the Midwest
don't blame chuds for this, biz would never ever support eminent domain, this crap happens because keynsian progressives supported shit like eminent domain to the extreme from the 30s to 70s.
To some level that was needed but by allowing eminent domain to get so powerful politicians did retarded shit.
No they're not.
I couldn't ride a subway in NY without some nigger flipping around on the handrails or playing music as loud as possible
When people say they dislike public transportation, its not the concept itself, its always just the absolute revulsion of being forced in a closed environment with blacks.
There are countless examples in any modern metropolis where someone, unaware of the USA nigger problem, could say "ah this is a poor design!" Problem is they're objectively wrong as they're ignoring the fundamental reality of crime and who causes it, regardless of its origin being either "socioeconomic factors" or "niggers are just dumb animals".
Stop being racist chud.