Smartcon pattern spoonfeeding

>SAP VC arm (SAP IO) is going to SmartCon
>'who cares? it's just a VC arm?'

>Microsoft VC arm (M12) is going to SmartCon
>'who cares? it's just another VC arm?'

>Samsung VC arm (Samsung Next) is going to SmartCon
>'who cares? there's certainly no pattern emerging there, go back to sleep ok???'

>Head of DTCC's "Project Whitney", now renamed "DSM", which aims to tokenize private securities on mainnet for corpo VCs, is going to SmartCon and will very likely leverage link/deco
>who will be the first pilot partners/users of DSM? some of these big corpo VCs maybe?

>Chainlink Labs casually incubates its own blockchain-native big data warehouse (billions dollars industry), which despite stupid hobbyist literally who name is really just a white-label offshoot of big data giant Teradata using Chainlink under the hood, with globohomo leaders lke their CTO/former Obama tech advisor placed right next to sirgay, and corporate VCs like Samsung involved, all orchestrated behind the scenes by that based smug kike midget Spencer, one of the og defi1.0 VCs still left standing after the retards like Zhu blew themselves up with shit picks and degen leverage

>no one has connected the dots yet

FREE BONUS FOR THE WEEKEND:
oh and they just listed their new go-to-market lead for CCIP+DECO. now ask yourself why both services are getting repped by the same lead when they aren't released yet, unless they're both near ready to... go to market?

meet Pieter Pauwels, h index of 30, author of two research papers on zk KYC solutions leveraging DONs, possibly fan zhang's replacement:

eprint.iacr.org/2022/321
eprint.iacr.org/2021/907

Attached: 1635149488055.jpg (897x3120, 996.25K)

This is all great n stuff but the token just simply is not needed.

user I appreciate you, I really do. But we have been eating breadcrumbs like this for years and we are all tired of starving. Give me the fucking loaf or I literally don’t care.

Has fan zhang left?

Yeah fuck that guy user. I agree, and not only that, I'll even hold your tokens for you to free up some space in your wallet.

>going to SmartCon is BULLISHHHH1!1!1!!1!1!

I attended a high prestige water management conference in NY. Every agency that was “high end” was there. I’m talking about engineering firms, international agencies, you name it. LOL literally no one gave a shit about the conference most were there to just fuck and it shows. SmartCon is going to be a bust.

In August 2020 he said he'd be spending a year at Chainlink to productize DECO. He took an assistant professor position at Yale in July of this year but his linkedin says he's still a Senior Researcher at Chainlink Labs.

Attached: smartcredit deco.jpg (680x513, 73.66K)

test

I was going to say thanks great thread, but I agree with this user. I'm just tired or crumbs.
If you graphed bullish news per project it would certainly look like their Chainlink integration graph, but the market doesn't give a shit.
The worth of their token is minimal and mostly speculative, unless staking goes lve so we can get cold APR I don't give a shit.
Give me revenue.

t. 2017 newfag

how long until the supply crunch will happen?
you embody the majority of crypto investors this is why the price sucks because you want everything right now it is a better strategy to follow the masses until it isn't.

>you embody the majority of crypto investors this is why the price sucks because you want everything right now
Pure fucking cope right here. When everyone in the market starts associating a token with lackluster performance relative to the market it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy as a huge chunk of the market avoids that particular token during bullruns, no matter the news

oooh stinky linkies with your stinkcon, when will you learn

Attached: 1655567436471.jpg (4000x5505, 3.67M)

Hahahahahahaha. Blame the investors for getting scammed. What is this, Statera???

>duuuuuuude just get completely fleeced and smile about it

Chainlink = Enron jr, except no one outside of crypto will give a fuck when the reality sets in

Attached: D02B8127-0FEA-4711-BAE3-804B95DCD6F0.jpg (1125x1809, 746.76K)

It’s more like theranos

fundamentally, it will take a couple of years for higher prices because the demand from legacy is still very low even if adapted by swift or dtcc because it will be a optional.

This would make sense if it was a stock but this is crypto. 5 years in crypto is equivalent to holding 20 years in stock.

If you’re holding more than 5 years to make your doing something seriously wrong. And I am sick and tired of you retards lying to yourself about it either

link requires legacy adoption otherwise demand is low it's backend not a L1 everyone needs and legacy is slow and takes several years to adopt new tech everything else is wishful thinking. thats why so few make it.

>If you’re holding more than 5 years to make *it you’re doing something seriously wrong. And I am sick and tired of you retards lying to yourself about it *too
Wtf autocorrect spazzed out on me

You’re full of shit you’re coping to the max. I remember clear as day everyone was yelling 1k eoy every single day. You’re just trying to come up with some kind of bullshit reasoning to why the price hasn’t budged at all. And if you honestly think that than it’s time to admit biz was wrong and move on. But I know you’re not going to do that because you need to somehow prove yourself you made the right choice instead of admitting you were wrong. Honestly, good luck with that. As for me, I’m going to wait out until the end of year to see what happens, but honestly it looks like nothing will happen

Shut the fuck up and go fuck yourself you hopium dealing shill scum.

You've been spamming Chainlink breadcrumbs for FIVE FUCKING YEARS and the price is the same as it was 3 years ago.
Bullrun missed completely.
I don't give a fuck about your shitty breadcrumbs anymore, chainlink had its chance and it blew it.

Pic related, all link holders still holding onto "crumbs" and pretending that LINK hasn't been an utter dogshit investment for the past 3 years.

Attached: 305087964078211.png (1024x803, 577.76K)