Has society really changed?

Has society really changed?

Attached: Neo Fudalism.jpg (2160x1080, 320.03K)

Yes, they didn't have porn back then

It's gotten far worse

The lords actually cared for the peasants and the peasants could kill the lords if they weren’t doing a good job. Plus peasants had much more time off then we had and didn’t live in modern globohomo hell and still had community, family and a culture to be proud of,

Attached: AD111B92-81E3-4B44-822C-824DD120F5DD.jpg (334x1024, 77K)

Did peasants actually own their land though? Was real estate unaffordable back then for the majority?

>Yes, they didn't have porn back then
They've got brothels back then, friend. You could buy a clean, 12 year old girl with a few silver coins in the past.

You're fucked in the head my man.

No, he's right. The modern political system is a complex machine ran by tens of thousands of people around the world. The only way it will end is when the machine destroys itself.

The idea that monarchy is going to solve his issues is beyond retarded

Monarchy might not fix our problems, but it is inevitable. It's like the seasons, a country starts as a monarchy, then become a republic, then a democracy, then an oligarchy, then there is a violent revolution and you go back to monarchy again. Read Decline of the West.

I love the idea of a monarchy cuz it totally removes social political tension. Every body is just on the same page that the king is an ass and if he keeps it up we're gonna kill him. So based and intuitive. Way less beaurocratic crap too.

You don‘t know much.

yeah they rented it. This was a plaque on a 2 storey timber frame in england that is an open museum now

Attached: catchlove house rent.png (767x684, 794.18K)

>clean

If you think about it even slave owners feed and gave shelter to their slaves because they saw them as investments.

If poor people die now they can always just ship in more immigrants to replace them.

1614 wasn't feudal. Commoners had a lot of hard-won rights.

Most philosophers agree that a monarchy with a good king/queen is the best form of government. The problem is that good king/queens are so rare that monarchy is not wroth the downsides.

If you have a bad king you can just kill him. There were Roman Emperors who only lasted a few months.

In reality most monarchs were ok, its just that you hear more about the shit ones.

Right back at you.

Are you ready for global AI dominance?

no we will destroy the state
get ready for Ancapistan

Plus bear in mind if you were a "bad" monarch it usually meant the nobility hated you, but it didn't mean the peasants hated you. Alexander II of Russia was hated by the nobles because he stripped them of much of their power, but he was a relatively popular Emperor among the peasants of Russia.

dios mio

Thats just the top and the bottom moving against the middle class, its centralization.