Why didn’t LINK go to $100 last year in the summer?

It was going to $100+ until the May 2021 death candle. Why did LINK die right as it was poised to go to triple digits?

Attached: C1298E7B-710D-4AC2-B990-9D8D45E7CD18.jpg (1484x435, 335.87K)

There is a laundry list of people suppressing this token. Celsius/Mashinsky, SBF, Simeon and Nexo, Sergey, SWIFT, too many to list. This isn't going up until we all capitulate

But why? Why just not let it go to $100 during the last bullrun? So many tokens did 1000x regardless, LINK could’ve went to $100 and had crashed with the market anyway and it would’ve been fine.

That’s all retarded cope bullshit. It’s just people selling because it’s a useless coin. On paper chainlink is an amazing project. In reality no one really needs oracles.

All I needed was $100+ to put it through my thick skull I should sell. But unfortunately my retarded gambler brain didn’t get the price target, and now I’m down 90%. It’s my fault obviously, but that’s all LINK needed to do and my life would’ve been so much better.

Attached: 8208CF3D-4ED5-4217-9F04-6F6946EEB624.jpg (816x300, 54.03K)

Because the team scammed their own investors. 500k weekly dumps, shilling celsius who actively shorted them. Sergey’s karmic debt is MASSIVE at this point, which helps me sleep at night

That was sarcasm user. Fact of the matter is the public has no reason to buy this over a shitcoin going up 3x in 24 hours, or something like ETH which you need to send said shitcoins to a DEX. LINK would've gone to $100 if they released 0.1 last summer, or someone like Elon or Mark Cuban tweeted about it. That's how fickle the markets are

>In reality no one really needs oracles
Well over 99% of blockchain use cases require oracles. Chainlink is more valuable than every single other crypto project combined

Cope
Just look at the price.

Why do you faggots let sergey off the hook. Why arent we suing them for fraud seriously

Real shame Sergey never did ANYTHING to hype up token price during the bullrun, they could’ve sold less tokens for a higher price and had a larger war chest, but no they just couldn’t do that. A real shame.

yeah this is the best and worst thing about the team
could pump the token so much if they wanted but instead are completely pure

nah, you're just simple-minded
half of the interesting usecases don't need oracles
the other half get more from truly decentralized oracles than centralized oracle aggregators masquerading as decentralized
realistically there's no need to tie a shitcoin to a robust decentralized oracle system

Yeah, really hurts in retrospect. I was completely unable to mentally sell any LINK under $100. $100 was the first mega cash out point for me. Less than a 2x from making it and now I’m sitting here on a Friday night depressed wondering what could’ve been.

Token not needed.

99 link threads today and every day and for that reason alone I hope it goes to $0

He has had quite a few mishaps in the last two years including:
>Featuring Celsius/Bancor prominently as partners
>Selling way too many tokens at once for "node incentives"
>Just tweeting about binance casino shitcoins instead of Fortune 500 partnerships
>Overhiring roasties and marketing deadweight
>Releasing new years video and not delivering 8.5 months into the year

Let's hope the CEO change rumor is real

alt season cancelled, we had dogcoin season instead

Because the token just isn't needed.

All that was needed was just SOME sort of staking coming out last year, and the hype would’ve been huge and easily pushed LINK into triple digits. I don’t understand why Sergey couldn’t just do this staking 0.1 stuff last year, and everyone would’ve won (both team and investors).

>pure

The Fuck are you smoking

>lady luck
>celsius
>staking “almost finished” in 2019

Because hes a fucking scam artist, thats why. And staking still isnt ready now, nor will it be at ANY point this year

The problem is he didn't say his plans got delayed by the ETH merge delay.
Look at this slide from his initial presentation.
Not only the growth in contract calls got stalled by the mini bear market this year, but CCIP was a big plan for this year's increase in smart contract usage.
You don't add 50% of your previous year's contract usage in 2 month when releasing a new feature.

This chart hints that the release of CCIP got delayed and reality won't fit with this chart.
It will be interesting to see how Sergey updates his chart after this year ends.
We will then likely see that the smart contract growth has been slower than expected in his initial planning for this year.

All the important features bringing new income sources and growth have been delayed by ETH. This delay is 5-6 month this year, but the reason we had to wait so long for staking is because ETH kept delaying their updates and not delivering on the scalability.

Attached: Smart Contract Growth Chainlink.png (1443x816, 228.43K)

It's a wonder it even hit 50. The only reason it did so was because long time holders hyped it enough to offload their bags for a 250x profit. Ever wonder why the OG's all left Any Forums?

kek same, triple digits and I probably would have cashed out a little and been chilling. Instead I'm poor and worried