Don't mind me, I'm just checking something.
Don't mind me, I'm just checking something
Connor Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.alice.al
archive.alice.al
twitter.com
Mason Ortiz
What no /dg/?
Charles Martinez
VERILY
Joshua Lewis
you've been at this all weekend, user. apply to be a janitor if you want to change Any Forums that badly
Hunter Roberts
Sex with bunny
Juan Diaz
Keep it up OP, even if you're a faggot, you're not as big of a faggot as these OPs you've listed are.
Nathan Adams
>all weekend
Huh? It's only been the two threads before this one. And I don't want to clean up the board, I just find this stuff interesting.
William Foster
Is Alola Ninetales poster okay with sexualizing underage girls
Caleb Green
My take: the law doesn't give a shit what happens to an animal, while jerking it to underage (human) girls will get you raped in prison.
Levi Jones
does have a point though i got b& for posting braixen wearing pantsu the other day even tho thats adding clothing to something naked
Matthew Clark
The point is the lack of consistency. The mods are obviously ignoring the threads they like. If Any Forums is going to be NSFW anyway, why remove any smut at all? It's simply pointless and hypocritical.
Parker Sanders
just post the filter list already
Asher Howard
bumping for this
Jaxon Foster
>jerking it to underage (human) girls will get you raped in prison
That sounds dystopian af
Easton Cook
Those were clearly hand-selected. Also..
>using filters at all
Ayden Campbell
I hope he does this every day, ban evasions and all. It's a pokemon board, not a loli/yuri/hentai/pedo board.
Blake Brooks
Lack of consistency means that of the mods we get visiting Any Forums, most don't care, but one or two does, or that we just don't get much moderation gracing us with their presence at all.
"""Technically""", softcore stuff, SFW stuff and such isn't against the rules anymore, Pokemon or not, though you can tell there's at least one mod that hasn't learned about the rule change, despite it happening something like two years ago.
Outright porn and nudity is banned, yeah, but fawning over curvy Pokemon and scantily-clad women is fine within the rules.
OP's image is leaning too much "no", I think. There's enough curves there to justify calling it a "nude" image, despite nothing being shown.
Not that lopunny is really all that SFW in design, t.b.h.
John Evans
That's only with the, uh, whatever they call it, the SHIELD Act, which has only been used in court maybe like five times ever across the US.
One of the cases was some neckbeard coomer getting ratted out by his wife for having loads of anime loli porn on his PC, if I remember right.
Juan Martinez
Please keep this up, OP or anyone else with the sufficient Autism
Evan Gray
>50817342
>Magneto wants to be a flaming doge in order to fuck little girls and boys
WTF is wrong with him?