How many of you are going to be sued? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

how many of you are going to be sued? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Attached: jb62ffr001e91.jpg (1125x1667, 169.54K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lumendatabase.org/notices/25216054#
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Quick rundown?

Sued for what?
Not all of us live in the jewnited states

with jews you lose

suing over this is frivolous, bordering on malicious

I would try to get the initiating lawyer fined

>just baby cock sucking, pedokike things

Attached: kike.jpg (372x350, 46.62K)

sued of the first tweet presumably

the guy got sued

He talked about Jessica Khater's previous line of work before she was hired at Celcius.

He wasn't sued for talking about it or posting the meme, he intentionally counterclaimed their DMCA takedown which means the idiot was directly inviting them to sue him. Pretty retarded move. OP leaves out a lot of context.

Attached: Untitled.png (637x680, 66.45K)

uhhhm sweetie
How can you be sued for that?
Don't you amerigoys have freedom of speech?

She was a fucking whore and I jacked off twice to her vid.

Attached: kids.png (463x652, 430.74K)

Attached: 1658454116094354.jpg (828x821, 656.06K)

kek imagine being the guy in celcius damage control that has to start emailing people and making phone calls because a retard posted the meme of your whore coworker again

Not necessarily Celsius. He didn't give much information just said "someone." So it could be someone representing Jessica directly.

>Before you send a counter-notice, you should consider carefully whether you are in fact infringing the complaining party's copyright. There are two reasons for you to consider this carefully. First, the counter-notice requires you to state, under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that your material was wrongly removed. You do not want to make this claim lightly because it might come back to haunt you. Second, if the complaining party has a good infringement claim, sending a counter-notice may trigger a lawsuit. If you are not prepared to stand up for your use of the copyright owner's work in a lawsuit, you should think twice about firing back a counter-notice. That said, copyright owners sometimes send bogus takedown notices that have no basis in law or fact, which are meant solely to intimidate the target. A prompt counter-notice can make these empty threats go away for good.

The fact that they initiated a lawsuit instead of backing down means this twitter fag is basically fucked because they have good reason to believe their claim was defensible in court. He should have read up on the legal consequences before counterclaiming. Can't wait to see the fallout of this.

If this is the same page back in facebook then the owner of that page is a huge faggot and deserve to get sued.

Upon further investigation that seems to be exactly the case. Here's a previous takedown request against various sites made on behalf of Jessica.

lumendatabase.org/notices/25216054#

Does anyone here have this meme???

Attached: 1657942541948.png (640x520, 268.79K)

Celsius stole all your money and now they're going to put you in jail for slandering them for saying they were stealing money.

>YOU'RE JUST A BLACKPILLED INCEL LOSER
It's funny that something along those lines is the response when you point out that society has reached a new level of FUCKED when a literal pornstar was hired to manage a billion dollars and then it all fucking collapsed
>b-but it's always been like this
Women got hired easily to secretary jobs to suck their old boss's cock, they didn't get literally promoted to near-ceo levels while only having experience servicing penises publicly documented. We have reached the endgame of of post-modern society, the question is now how long we can stay "almost economically crashing but not quite" to keep the ball in the air so all the whores and jews can suck whatever's left out of us.

Attached: 1654666431667.png (311x274, 109.32K)

I'm going to impregnate watame !

According to Lumen: "This studio has been sued and the judge declared all copyrights of this studio go to the women depicted in the videos."

So it seems Jessica now owns the copyrights to the original GDP video, which INCLUDES still images from the video. The image that the twitter fag originally posted contained a still image from the video. And Jessica has hired one or multiple "brand protection" agencies to scour the web looking for any and all pages with the video or images from the video. If you search her name on the Lumen database you'll find hundreds of results of takedown notices over the past year.

You fags have been posting that girls stuff for years to embarrass her for no reason. Good for her for slapping that fag with a lawsuit