Why are matic and uniswap mooning? These coins aren’t even fucking needed. Why isn’t chainlink fucking mooning?
Why are matic and uniswap mooning? These coins aren’t even fucking needed. Why isn’t chainlink fucking mooning?
Why is my snail constantly climbing up the side of the tank then falling down?
>chainlink
>needed
>Why isn’t chainlink fucking mooning?
take a guess
The decentralized space has never experienced a combined multifaceted single asset supply crunch at the same time as that asset increases demand through passive income. In an asset that offers passive income this generally results in one outcome: extreme price action that vastly outstrips appropriate valuation based on revenue and an eventual bubble. This bubble, for the above reasons, will be at least one order of magnitude greater than what was seen with eth in 2017.
Expect the following:
- Within the next year link above 300 with retail level staking yields through established nodes of 2-3%, 5-8% for new nodes looking to build reputation
- Within the next three years link topping out between 4,000 and 12,000 with retail yields under 1%
- Once the retail yield of link stays under 1% for 3 months, consider selling some as a significant drop of over 80% will occur
- The market will then mature with data based multivariate models and will grow at rates similar to f500 indices while also offering low (1-3%), predictable yields
Yes unironically. Are uniswap and matic needed? Answer the question before you deflect it faggot.
>The decentralized space has never experienced a combined multifaceted single asset supply crunch at the same time as that asset increases demand through passive income. In an asset that offers passive income this generally results in one outcome: extreme price action that vastly outstrips appropriate valuation based on revenue and an eventual bubble. This bubble, for the above reasons, will be at least one order of magnitude greater than what was seen with eth in 2017.
>Expect the following:
>- Within the next year link above 300 with retail level staking yields through established nodes of 2-3%, 5-8% for new nodes looking to build reputation
>- Within the next three years link topping out between 4,000 and 12,000 with retail yields under 1%
>- Once the retail yield of link stays under 1% for 3 months, consider selling some as a significant drop of over 80% will occur
>- The market will then mature with data based multivariate models and will grow at rates similar to f500 indices while also offering low (1-3%), predictable yields
>what are transaction fees
you braindead cultists never cease to amaze me
uni moons on insider trading news of robinhood listing. chainlink listed on robinhood and doesnt do shit. Either everything else is manipulated and chainlink isnt, or everything else isnt manipulated and chainlink is.
Robinhood just adopted UNI. Man, they are so behind lol
You cunts are just dumb and don't know anything about nothing. Just admit you're not that bright and you're basically gambling with all your investments.
>Why isn’t chainlink fucking mooning?
because it is run by literal Any Forums nazis, when asked why staking and CCIP aren't done yet Sergey answered
>because of those damn kikes and niggers
>you need uniswap and matic for transaction fees
You are a nigger
You get cheaper ATM fees when you gamble in with these particular casinos kek ftfy
Why are the tokens that people actually use and care about going up while the token literally no one cares about goes down? Gee I have no idea user that's a mystery
Because sergey owns 65% of the supply and has dumped billions in usd worth. Its a literal scam, and you're a retard
Uniswap inflated more than Chainlink over the same time period.
S in advance
If it were mooning BTC would be crashing.
If you think LINK's artificial "need" is legitimate, then a gas token like matic is also needed, faggot.
What about Uniswap?