I hold Everest (ticker: ID) because I enjoy profiting from the labour of illegal immigrants

I hold Everest (ticker: ID) because I enjoy profiting from the labour of illegal immigrants

Attached: 7B53F472-E82B-4BD3-94D1-BCD1B332BACA.jpg (850x813, 167.2K)

Attached: C68E771D-E922-41E9-A25C-E521A1FAE283.jpg (1500x992, 781.4K)

we will use them to pack our bags

Attached: DA34C798-8092-41B5-B145-BE0BE1489736.jpg (959x620, 456.25K)

I hold everest ID bc I am a cuck and I like to watch my networth go to zero

No joke. I even have a validator stack

We also like watching your networth go to zero.
what is debank?

>what is debank?
it's a program that shows you the thing

Never heard of it in my life. All I know is Bob is a ninja master with those hand movements of his so you better invest now or he is gonna slaughter your whole family

The sheer tokenomics of Everest alone guarantees that one day 1 LINK = 1 ID. There are only 800,000,000 ID tokens which will be systematically burned by usage of features on the Everest platform, i.e. regulatory compliant KYCing. Not to mention every single institution in crypto and the legacy world wanting to onboard into DeFi will be forced to stake 250,000 tokens if they want full access to the features of Everest. It is not only well within the realms of possibility that 1 LINK = 1 ID given these tokenomics compared to Chainlink’s 1,000,000,000 model - it is an eventual guarantee. By the will of Kek and the All Father, this manifestation is destined to take place. Even if it takes Chainlink dumping further.

Attached: 1655456505202.gif (777x498, 1.6M)

This image from the newsletter implies FTX listing.

Attached: index.png (600x1205, 70.36K)

Attached: wonderjace.png (969x1352, 1.08M)

Not to say Sam wouldn’t list the token, but aren’t they mainly using FTX so they don’t have liquidity issues when users want to trade or move funds?

Would FTX not need to list ID for Everest to be able to trade ID via FTX?

Idk what their exact arrangement is but FTX just needs to provide liquidity to Everest. That can be done via a pool without ever being listed on a CEX.

It could also be done directly as well.

from newsletter:

"In June, we released our SDK sandbox, which brings in a suite of functionality (dozens of APIs) that enable developers, DEXes, merchants to onboard users, eKYC them, pull in fiat, purchase crypto, send to wallet, convert crypto to other fiats, and deposit in other banks. This core suite of functionality relies heavily on our CRDT architecture/engine, custodian license and accounts scattered around the world.

Adding a Beta UI, which we've shown a few times, is clearly the next step. Additionally, we demonstrated a zero-knowledge proof of (a) KYC status, and (b) humanness/uniqueness.....this is a first in the industry (not just announce it.....show it).

Also, we integrated access to liquidty......ability to borrow $$ millions on-demand, allowing users to buy crypto or send overseas in seconds. This liquidity source and integration meant delaying other features, but does put Everest in a position to scale."


Ongoing Developments
Minting of NFTs to share identity claims (lots of interest around this)

Organizational or DAO identities demonstrated and developing into a product

The SDK that allows DEXes and Dapps to add fiat-in/out is pretty much ready to go, which we're very excited about

Debit card for fiat-in is coming along (targeting August)

Adding networks and getting EverChain into testnet

Attached: C69D1E95-599E-4388-8E12-EC01F23DFF3F.jpg (1170x429, 71K)

Legacy Remittances can't compete.

Attached: bobgas.jpg (667x660, 332.08K)

>not using the Bob Wojak in a meme
pathetic

Attached: Bob Wojak.jpg (680x867, 217.86K)

get in bros
here's the discord invite
y84NRyydzd

Attached: image_2022-07-13_114757275.png (5334x3000, 1.24M)

Attached: 274E3EAF-CCBE-4977-8FBD-46D8DEFEC802.jpg (850x813, 186.83K)

based

LOL i laughed so HARD, now I must acquire a sui stack of 10k ID

how much does it cost to get fake comments like these ?