Ilca made this

>Ilca made this
Maybe, just maybe, it's not actually the devs who are at fault for most of modern Pokemon's issues, but the limited time they're allowed on each game

Attached: one piece o.png (1051x563, 1.28M)

That game looks like shit and One Piece fans need to stop gobbling up shitty video games like Pokemon fans

I think everyone's known it has to do with time limits, only time I see people use lazy is for certain designs but that's something different from graphics and models

Sadly Pokemon is gonna need several monumental failures in a row before they'll actually change the release cadence. As long as it prints money they aren't going to want to change anything out of fear of crumbling their empire.

>No Switch version

So maybe the problem was hardware.

>even ilca didn't give a fuck about sinnoh remakes so they had their interns develop it while the actual devs made a real game
i pity you sinnoh fags. nobody gave a shit about your region.

It's still going to suck

Pokemon's main forte is merch, misc merch. The thing is that for easy new merch you need new content which comes from games and anime so the developers are under pressure to put product as fast as possible, otherwise you can just pick a page from Zelda and delay the launch some months or even a year.

this is a PS5 game retard
it loooks like a PS3 game

Just look at their concept art for dppt remakes, it looks odly similar to what legends arceus turned out to be

This is what im talking about. Gf obviously made them do the worse looking remakes cause they cant allow another company to make a better game than them and they tried to copy their ideas for legends arceus, explains why both games feels rushed too.

Attached: 7uujfb3vy2181.jpg (4032x3024, 1.62M)

The character models are awful and they're reusing the engine and assets from DQ11

Pretty sure the LLCA issue was the budget, just look up their soulful concept art for what in the end was just a 1:1 remaster.

The games don't print money, the merch does
The games could underperform but as long as the new merch sells they don't care

>The games don't print money
>always in the top 10 of their respective consoles with a third of the budget of anything close
sure user

fuck im part of the problem, i pirate all the games but still buy plushes and stuff

Attached: tough place.jpg (508x382, 36.86K)

At least any other product than the games are made with a minimum of care for quality

>He thinks Bandai Namco is ilca just because they helped with one thing
Cool
Monolith soft made the new Kirby game

That doesn't elimnate his point.

All those sales benefit 3 parties. 4 if you count TPCi as a separate entity. If anything, part of the games' sales are just seed money for new merchandising ideas.

It just goes to show piracy isn't really damaging the brand.

The games DO print money, TPC just doesn't bang on about them, as the core games' profits don't touch their coffers in any way, shape or form.
Meanwhile, Nintendo absolutely loves the fact the games sell 6m first week/mid-teens millions after 6 weeks as most of those sales have a console sale tagged on, further increasing the profit every pokémon game makes (but as not even Game Freak gets console sale cuts, no cunt is tallying THESE figures).

Attached: Pokémon doubles the console sales on launch.png (825x147, 14.86K)

It's also on ps4, but not Switch

I bet it makes Nintendo seethe imagine being them spending years putting actual effort into building a great engine, nice graphics, getting rid of bugs, carefully designing games. GF comes along shits out a buggy low effort mess that runs at 5 fps, with the same story theyve been using since gen 3, looks like ass and is something youd get a refund for on steam if it was made by any other dev and it outsells their first party games

Attached: comical.jpg (336x442, 90.91K)

The trailer literally said it's developed by Ilca you retard. Bamco's in-house deleopers don't have anything to do with their licensed games. They were either made by CyberConnect2 or Spike Chunsoft.