Why is Gen 8 like this?

why is Gen 8 like this?

Attached: 573737.jpg (4096x3276, 1.26M)

I thought Duraladon was fine

Jamers Turner

why is gen 5 like this?

Attached: garbage.jpg (1440x743, 532.89K)

Beartic looks like something a five year old drew

the folks at GF forgot how to design Pokemon during genv and never remembered, forgetting more and more each passing gen

It's a bummer that gen 8 went right back to gen 5 retardedness when it comes to Pokemon designs. I really tought gen 6 and 7 were major improvements and both had tons of really creative ideas and on the whole were very well-designs despite some nu-gen tropes like massive heads and undetailed limbs. But unfortunately gen 8 broke that streak of improvement. Here to hope gen 9 is better!

Attached: 2AC7DD24-4739-4BD0-B6A9-9C4CEF43492D.png (475x475, 116.89K)

idk I like them. the rock is cute. though Carkol is really disappointing, Rolycoly was really cute.

No. Gen 8 is worse. It has shit like Stonjourner, and Enamorus.

I remember defending these shitters at school back in the day, nowadays even I know I was being a whiny defensive kid lmao

and now you defend these awful gen 8 tranny designs. kys

Beacuse G*larmons are just stepping stones for than Pokemon from Kanto Proper.

Attached: Welcome to the Kantonian Isles.jpg (720x720, 72.03K)

Stonejourner isnt worse than Klinklank (no pokemon is) and Enamorus is bad because genies (a gen 5 invention) inherently look like shit

Now you defend the shitty gen 6 designs. Not exactly doing any better.

>it not cool looking animal so design bad!

Attached: NPC_wojak_meme.png (200x198, 17.49K)

>hitoshi ariga is james turner

I actually love the coal pile, like some weird rock-barbecue turtle

The others though…no thanks

>>it's a shitty looking object so it's good!

If it's done in a way that makes sense, then yes, it is good.

ywnbaw

>The sheer fragility of Borts
It's so sad to see.

These designs are weak and feminine. Only trannies would defend them.

but its not