why is Gen 8 like this?
Why is Gen 8 like this?
I thought Duraladon was fine
Jamers Turner
why is gen 5 like this?
Beartic looks like something a five year old drew
the folks at GF forgot how to design Pokemon during genv and never remembered, forgetting more and more each passing gen
It's a bummer that gen 8 went right back to gen 5 retardedness when it comes to Pokemon designs. I really tought gen 6 and 7 were major improvements and both had tons of really creative ideas and on the whole were very well-designs despite some nu-gen tropes like massive heads and undetailed limbs. But unfortunately gen 8 broke that streak of improvement. Here to hope gen 9 is better!
idk I like them. the rock is cute. though Carkol is really disappointing, Rolycoly was really cute.
No. Gen 8 is worse. It has shit like Stonjourner, and Enamorus.
I remember defending these shitters at school back in the day, nowadays even I know I was being a whiny defensive kid lmao
and now you defend these awful gen 8 tranny designs. kys
Beacuse G*larmons are just stepping stones for than Pokemon from Kanto Proper.
Stonejourner isnt worse than Klinklank (no pokemon is) and Enamorus is bad because genies (a gen 5 invention) inherently look like shit
Now you defend the shitty gen 6 designs. Not exactly doing any better.
>it not cool looking animal so design bad!
>hitoshi ariga is james turner
I actually love the coal pile, like some weird rock-barbecue turtle
The others though…no thanks
>>it's a shitty looking object so it's good!
If it's done in a way that makes sense, then yes, it is good.
ywnbaw
>The sheer fragility of Borts
It's so sad to see.
These designs are weak and feminine. Only trannies would defend them.
but its not