Polygon/Solana/AVAX daily revenue

MATIC bros winning big

Attached: 4019e1ff-fa08-49ca-bb47-fa19598c2645.jpg (1280x788, 63.18K)

how did this even happen?

There's a lot of people in India

Polygon has always had a way larger number of daily active users than both Avalanche and Solana
they also have a lot more daily transactions

Revenue is a meme ETH maxis came up with to cope with their network being unusable. BTC never had high revenue, Most valuable things don't have high revenue (From gold to land).

Also i think Avalanche revenue was sky high too before they introduced Subnets which took out most of the load from the C-Chain, This IS a good thing, It's unbelievable how brainwashed and corrupted some people in this space are to ponder the logic of High fees with higher revenue>Low fees, same demand with lower revenue

this retard just contradicted himself
MATIC fees are way lower than AVAX cuck fees yet they still have a ton more revenue
obviously revenue is a very important metric if you take context into consideration faggot

Avalanche revenue is higher even now post Subnets solution. Anyway, Decentralised projects prove that people are willing to pay for the blockspace, I'm not sure if that will be the case with Matic when fees start rising in a more positive market.

Attached: TokenTerminalRevenue.png (1101x691, 42.89K)

yeah i think polygon has like 250,000 something daily active users

What the fuck is Polygon? And has more DAUs than Solana, lmao you’re done here.

go check for yourself

>even post subnets solution
isnt this the same chain that had gas fees reach up to $14 not too long ago? TOP KEK
seethe avax faggot

Attached: avax camp.jpg (1124x1137, 235.47K)

avax cucks seem it unironically forget about that time

Attached: 40292c68-57b5-4b14-911a-ba134754978c.jpg (1024x564, 42.23K)

it was because of a ddos attack you faggots
lets not forget that sunflower game

the sunflow DDOS attack might be the worst attacks in crypto history yet STILL polygon fees were below $1
>rope avax baggie

calm down
revenue is a simple product of the money people are willing to spend for interacting with a particular product
if you believe all products are equal, then people would flock to the lowest cost product
if they don't, then there is some qualitative difference
whether that's because "people pay for eth security" or "inertia and marketing are making people stick with an inefficient solution", either interpretation is possible (as well as many others)
as a shitcoiner you should obviously go for the latter rather than get angry at the metric

>20 min finality
>2 nodes can take down the entire network
>entire TVL secured by a 5/8 multi-sig
>daily 100tx+ re-orgs
yep, polygon stays winning b-bros

Matic? The chain that was crippled to a halt by a sunflower game? Cool.

>if it’s not perfect already it’s shit

Take some cognitive behavioural therapy

Avalanche has released the non-custodial browser extension CoreApp. This is great news!

>AVAX cuck
the arguments get more sophisticated by the day.

>Earns less than Ethereum L2s
>Earns less than Ethereum dapps
>Earns less than a Fantom dapp
KEK

Attached: fees.png (460x758, 56.88K)