which pokemon are always misrepresented in fanart?
Which pokemon are always misrepresented in fanart?
samurott
almost always drawn off model just so they can make it look not retarded
nice gmax zangoose bro.
>always drawn off model just so they can make it look not retarded
thats the case for every single mons made after gen 2.
All of them.
The Pokémon community is mostly made up of furries and zoophiles.
I really fucking hate looking for art of my favourite Pokémon, because I know I'll have to sift through 100 lewd/furry pics before I find one good piece of art.
Fuck furries for ruining this franchise, and fuck GF and Jewmes Turner for blatantly pandering to them since Gen 3.
This, but for Rhydon.
hatterene but in her case it's a good thing
>inb4 gardevoir/lopunny/vaporeon/sprigatito
finding eeveelution art that don't make them look like disney characters is hard as fuck
>turner boogeyman
Incineroar, they always draw it as a muscular man, including his legs and "hands", which look silly
If only deranged horny idiots were less blatant with their disgusting fetishes every now and then…
You must be 18+ to post here dear user
having lugia as fav pokemon is particularly painful i must admit.
>thats the case for every single mons made after gen 2.
And even the ones before
pain
The way people draw Hatterene shows whether or not they are actually Pokemon fans
Every Pokemon people deem as "sexy", because they mainly just want to fuck them if they look more human.
off model hat is just a better design
The midget alien is better
only if you're a shitposter or into shortstacks (which are also off model)
People constantly draw Gardevoir off-model, but they’re still attractive even when the art stays true to their actual appearance. That’s what makes it so irritating. Gardevoir is already perfect, it’s already sexy without alterations.
>ITT: people posting about porn being off model
of course the porn is off model, can one of you post about a pokemon that is drawn wrong in a NON suggestive way?
This is much more attractive