Can it really be called the dark age if Gen 9 being the 5th bad generation in a row makes the franchise have more bad...

Can it really be called the dark age if Gen 9 being the 5th bad generation in a row makes the franchise have more bad gens than good ones? Shouldn't we call it the normal age as it is clearly the standard for years to come?

Attached: 1645995465972.png (725x408, 124.93K)

*6th bad generation in a row

*9th bad generation in a row

Gen 1 good
Gen 2 good
Gen 3 good
Gen 4 good because of HGSS because DPP shit
Rest bad

yes, dark age is a retarded term
use stagnation instead if you want a buzzword

> 5th Bad Generation in a row
> Gen 5 literally the best gen
> Gen 6s only bad games are XY
> Gen 7 is just average and certainly not bad
> Gen 8s only bad game is SwSh
> Gen 9 hasn't even come out yet and it's looking to be even more ambitious than Legends, taking the basic framework provided there but in a proper region with trainers, towns, cities, and gyms.

The denial some of you have about the quality of the franchise is fucking absurd.

Platinum is pretty good

> Gen 5 literally the best gen
Spot the Americuck

It's not.

I'm Greek and have to inhale some major copium over spain being a region rn and still no Greece region, so nice try.