What's so bad about pokephilia?

What's so bad about pokephilia?
Pokemon are animals, sure, but they have intelligence, some more than humans. Plus they're fictional creatures, so what's the harm?
I would like to hear everyone's opinion on the matter
(since everyone here is a furry whether they realize it or not).

This isn't a troll thread nor is it for porn. It's for srs discussan

Attached: Gary Motherfucking Oak.png (640x480, 278.69K)

You make a convincing argument, Mr. Gary.

It's only bad when its anthro.

>Pokemon are animals
Typical casual plant, fungus, and robot erasure

Nothing. It is only right to love your pokemon. What is more ethical?
>a typical pokemon that only gets to mate in a daycare center, breeding ranch, etc with pokemon it barely gets to know
>a pokemon who mates with its well loved life-long human companion whom it truly understands

To be okay with using sapients for battle, breeding profit, low/zero cost labor, etc but not some good consensual human dicking is bizarre

Attached: wifemon.png (798x598, 105.17K)

The power dynamics make it unethical

This, which is why you can only fuck pokemon that are taller than you.

Degenerate fetishists tend to never breed and saying “oh well that’s a good thing, just look at me!” is a logical fallacy when some of our most creative, intuitive, and brilliant minds were raised by insane, horrible, or abusive parents. You have no idea how bad parenting was between the 1800-1900’s if you think this fetish is an excuse for them not to pass down their genes.

Passing genes a overrated

sex with pokemon isn't BAD, it's TABOO. there's a big difference.
sex with pokemon is ethical as long as it's mutually satisfying.

>Pokemon are animals, sure, but they have intelligence, some more than humans.
>some more than humans.
You did not just go there.

Okay faggot let's put a Pokemon in the role of professor. Let's put fucking Alakazam on the scientist team.

There’s nothing wrong with it, people who freak out over it are just autists.

Attached: marriage.jpg (329x450, 37.78K)

Attached: T3as1c.gif (320x180, 726.26K)

>Plus they're fictional creatures
Fuck your cringey attitude Garreth, I want them to be real…

Gary Oak once again owning the libs with facts and logic

>DoNotFistAndroidGirls.png

It's bad because you are ruining a good thing meant for children. These are creatures meant to entertain children and engross them in a familiar world yet fantastical while teaching good morals such as living in harmony with the natural world and the beasts than inhabit it. Indeed unlike other series Pokémon lacks the type of sexualized designs found in other series.

Verily even the series *pushes* the view that Pokémon aren't people, not only via dialouge from NPCs or the Pokedex but also in behavior and presentation. The first interactions with a following Pokémon read more like it's a cute little pet rather than a person and Indeed they wrote actions such as Pokémon nibbling on your shoes, eating random things off the ground and random barking which, minus the shoe chewing, we see Pokémon do when player and Pokémon interactions are a bit more detailed. The games have no trouble programming dog-like behavior in these types of interactions, such as seeing Pokémon fighting over a toy ball to bring to their master so they can throw it again or Pokémon randomly barking when let out of their ball or out in a farm where they graze all day. Interactions with overworld Pokémon NPCs do not feel like you are interacting with a person nevermind the dog and cat like Interactions you have with your own Pokémon.

Pokémon is about humanity learning and living in harmony with the natural world but it also makes it very clear Pokémon are *not* people. Verily the games and the series in general tells us this all the time, clearly separating Pokémon from people. We even get little cracks here and there on what Pokémon *are* rather than the inanity the circus wants them to be. For example the adventure text in gen 4 calling them wild creatures, or an NPC calling them that to. Adaman in Arceus refers to Pokémon as scary beasts, showing that while one should respect Pokémon they're not people but creatures that are part of the natural world.

Attached: Ninetales Poliorketes .png (540x658, 340.71K)

Lopunny is a literal playboy bunny with a megaevolution that gives her torn tights.

She was literally custom made for human dick.

is it wrong for a big strong pokemon to fuck a weak lowly human?

Not in the slightest

Attached: 1644345755074.jpg (1280x720, 253.37K)

phew, ok good

Attached: 73ca9dbaf21196bbee86812e3aa6a352_cut01.png (549x533, 215.28K)

>good thing
lets not get ahead of ourselves here