>Realizes AEW will never be as big as WWE because it's ran by an IWC smark larping as a booker

Cope

Attached: C1084907-FF6A-4124-B3E2-C0228071DD68.png (750x517, 127.98K)

trips of truth

>make post about WWE & WWF
>get asked for proof
>provide proof
>retard complains about AEW
every fucking time

but since you want to go there, you probably thought that AEW should just appear out of nowhere and immediately match WWE's ratings, even though AEW had no name value or prior TV experience. Do you think that if you put a new wrestling show on TV, all wrestling fans should immediately watch it, including those established fans that WWE had built up for the past 30 years? The very same fans that are now in their 50's and make up the majority audience of WWE's viewership, the very same fans that don't watch anything else and won't watch anything else. The only wrestling they watch is WWE, no matter how bad or good it gets, they will continue to watch until they die. They will continue to use a television set when the rest of the world is using internet streaming.

not reading dude

didn't read. dilate, tranny.

>Cable TV loses between 5-8% of its audience every year due to cable cutting
>Only old people still swear by Cable TV
you're not really proving much here. We already know that when it comes to TV ratings, WWE's majority audience is the over 50's.

look at this cope

maybe you should, you may gain a brain cell

Is cable cutting not a thing? Do over 50's not make up the majority audience of RAW's viewership? If you're going to reply with buzzwords, please make sure you at least know how to use them correctly, otherwise you just look like a spacker.

nah reading tranny cope makes you dumber plus what the fuck are you still doing here anyways? Didn't I tell you to go dilate you worked shemale faggot?

You’re a retard worked by nielson

>sprays a load of shit on the screen
god, you can't even back and forth with you dimwits, you don't have a single thing of worth to say. It's 100% always going to be a buzzword reply or some shit about a tranny. how you function off the computer, I'll never know, you're probably a nice guy and would never say any of this shit to anyone in person. sad.

ok? you think they started their network in 2014 just cause? peacock gave wwe a billion dollars because theyre nice people? you think youre breaking some hot news here dumbass? also their le demos are still better than aews, you aewtists are the only people in the world who think having more viewers is bad.

next you're going to tell me that Nielsen is controlled by AEW

That was back when Alexa was on Raw

didn't read. go dilate, tranny.

The WWE Network was a business model created so that WWE could pocket subscription & PPV money in a way that means they don't have to pay the talent. It was also a catastrophic failure and didn't hit the 1 million active accounts like they first projected, though they did indeed break over a million accounts but these were mostly trial accounts to get a free month of viewing. WWE later used this account statistic in its deal with Peacock because even if only 500,000 people switched to Peacock, that's 500k more than they previously had and as long as they maintain that number, they make back the billion dollars that they gave WWE for streaming rights over the course of a few years.

The rest about AEW I don't care for being it's just you coping, but for the record, AEW is only averaging 150k less than RAW in 18-49. 18-49 being the money demo.

Attached: wwe loves the demo.png (1284x817, 578.13K)