>kleros jeets are saying that the CTO 51% attacking the protocol for financial gain is a good thing.
PNK is wine
Other urls found in this thread:
It's over for real this time. No amount of cope will fix this mess.
40$ EOY
$400
>Checkem
>the founder was just caught manipulating the protocol and it's going to pump the price
kek this is what we call deluded hopium
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>66966
I'm a bad bad boy!
nah you're just a a faggot
Qrd?
read the full evidence history of case 1170, not going to spoonfeed you
Thanks
Which dev is it? Is there any public announcement over it? I read the court docs and it seems that there was a transaction delayed that resulted it money being lost and an insurance claimed filed. The court suffered a 51% attack to side with the insurance company that the devs have a financial interest in. Is all of this over like 17k? Can someone explain to a retard like me what the fuck is happening?
It's just Clement testing the system
>Which dev is it?
It's a mystery; we just don't know. Pic related.
>Can someone explain to a retard like me what the fuck is happening?
People a claiming it's some kind of 4D chess stress test, but IMO his motive is pure megalomania. He thinks he knows the absolute truth better than any foolish juror, and thus is justified in controlling a majority stake in court to flip the verdict. Somehow, he believes that this is "in line with the game theory", even though it goes entirely against the purpose of Kleros to take a random unbiased sample of jurors. He basically admitted to this in the telegram.
pic related, his retarded justification
Vitalik knew from he start. Btw, are you 100% sure that the whale is not right. Perhaps you are getting bamboozled to vote against him just because he has more than 51%
forgot pic
पीएनके ठीक है
Scam
Clement got caught red handed stacking a court and case that he has financial incentive to win. This has nothing to do with the well being of Kleros as he is falsely misleading readers in that pic. The obvious proper ruling is to accept the claim.
it looks like its going that direction anyway though doesnt it? wasnt another appeal just approved?