Is he right?

I hope so.

I hope chainlink moons before then.

That is reality boy. You can't have a #1 super-power with a population of 70 iq obese Mexicans and Negroes. That is a slave population, not a creator/leader population.

Attached: Mexican.jpg (1800x1200, 201.32K)

Death to America.

Why does this board suddenly love David Hunter? Have his predictions in the past been right?

What is she thinking?

>there will be no gubmint!!
There will always be a government because there will always be groups of people who want to take control of a nation state, no matter how poor or broken it might be. You think the Taliban know how to manage a fucking country or economy?

Tribalism is the natural form of collective organisation

You're gonna see motherfuckers walking around without shoes.

Will some parts of US look and function like sub Saharan Africa ? At this rate it's very likely, and some people will argue that it's almost the case in some cities. Does it mean the whole country and every states will become Africa tier ? Certainly not.

>only a gradual decline. and it hasn't even started yet.
You're right that the decline is gradual when measured against a human lifespan, but you're wrong because it started a long time ago.

In retrospect the collapse of empires seems obvious. Historians condense a constellation of decades of compounding factors down to an easily digested list of major events knitted together by a handful of charts of definitely-super-important statistics and proudly assert that next time will be different. These declines seem to proceed at a snails pace until there is truly nothing more to give and the end is announced in one dramatic event. It's like drinking from a large keg that you can't see inside: everything seems fine until suddenly and without warning the wine stops flowing.

From the perspective of someone living through the decline, there is a seemingly perpetual sense that things are getting worse instead of better, but maybe if we just get the right people in power, or just focus on the right industry, or develop the right technologies, or unify a culture, that things can be set straight. Yet the overall health of the empire degrades a barely perceptible 1 or 2 percent per year, seemingly inconsequential or at least mendable at the time, but the degredation compounds year after year after year until eventually the empire can hardly be called even a shadow of its former self.

The Roman empire was in decline for over a hundred years before it could be said that it had collapsed. The Soviet Union legally dissolved in 1991, but even for such a short lived empire the stagnation and then decline could be said to have started fifty years earlier. The United States has similarly been stagnating and subsequently in decline since at least the 1960s - certainly long prior to the technical default against the gold standard in 1971 - and the fact that global technological advancements have given the illusion of progress does not refute that fact.