Why is shorting always considered much more risky than longing?

Why is shorting always considered much more risky than longing?

Attached: 1652316355475.png (1973x2237, 2.22M)

That's a guy... Isn't it?

why do you keep posting the same tranny comic?

Tell me it has a penis

That's a man

Women don't like short men. You're limiting your potential partners by resorting to shorting.

>comic
sauce?

what kind of faggot enjoys these stupid ass cartoons, bet you look like a complete loser.

i unironically look like this.

Attached: 1634860159810.jpg (2000x2000, 310.62K)

OP said so in a previous thread posting a different picture of that comic where one was sucking the dick of this tranny

In the long term, assets are biased towards going up in value, not down. Holding cash is then, in effect, taking a position that an asset will go down in value, so shorting it on top of that is like being double-short.

post feet

it's tranny propaganda, it's meant to trick you into liking trannies. It's not even male proportions so it's not a trap.

retardation

Do indeed post feet

How much?

Succ Microphone then post feet.

show hole sir

Attached: 1643912243007.jpg (822x612, 252.49K)

feet pics then GTFO

Attached: 1639432433119.jpg (631x602, 65.58K)

where are the feet pictures you son of a whore ser do the needful

When you short if the stock keeps going up you are going to lose more and more money. When you long the stock can only go to $0. It can't go negative.

>ruining a perfectly good tomboy by giving her a penis

Attached: 1448258987074.jpg (750x2185, 748.86K)

Good for you user!

L

O

N

D

O

N

any advice?