New R3 Corda information

Back in 2018 biz found this pic in the 'technical' of Corda. Since then Chainlink has reported 1000+ integrations but personally I was waiting for a R3 integration. It never came. Here is why

This new report from march this year states
>Oracles in Corda are Corda nodes running Corda
services which link the Corda network to the
outside world. They are not generally participants
in a business transaction but provide network
services. A node in need of any data served
by the oracle service would request the oracle
node to provide signed external data, which the
transacting node could then use in a business
transaction

bis.org/publ/othp47.pdf (3rd 'Oracle' control F result)

CBDC's are coming
>bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-22/central-banks-bis-develop-digital-currencies-platform-prototype
But it does not look like they understand the importance of a decentralized oracle just yet.

I know we will all make if from Chainlink but its all so tiresome..
Being early sounds great on paper but man..

Attached: r3.gif (2852x1378, 759.81K)

Other urls found in this thread:

accenture.com/us-en/blogs/blockchain-mps/cbdc-for-commercial-banks-part-2-how-to-prepare
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

What can you say, institutions are slow as always

Those in the know already knew that’s why link wasn’t $100 or $300. They have not been blessed with approval yet. Many more years of stellar performance are required by the upper echelons.

Link is also not in swift banking yet

>>Oracles in Corda are Corda nodes running Corda
Link for secure, authenticated, 'tailored' data feeds. And yeah Link holders are cursed because Sergey is going to take his sweet ass time, though this pedantry on his part is the reason it will ultimately succeed - Link holders at that time have had a significant portion of their life pass by(along with other investments)

The Chainlink is the source and giver of grace, yet some are denied its grace.

They are called the nolinkers, and they will banished from this board.

The right move was always to to buy things like ADA near the bottom while Link is up and put profits into Link

I think I’m not the only one on here that realizes that the Chainlink discussion on here isn’t organic at all.

A complex mix of paid shills and bots post memes and start conversation. Real anons browsing Any Forums think these convos are real and start making convos themselves. Then when things die down, the bots and paid shills start again to capture new bagholders.

Attached: 1599031402116.png (867x711, 533.63K)

ur not organic

most people who ended up holding 5-10k+ stacks over the years don't have the risk tolerance to go for those kinds of swings. It is easy to swing your bags when you aren't dealing with life changing amounts of money, not so much once you're well into six figs with years of hodling as well

>Oracles in Corda are Corda nodes running Corda services...

With just a plain reading, this doesn't really exclude Corda from running Chainlink software in their node to perform oracle jobs. Chainlink is truly open source, after all. Not saying there is any evidence this is true. I do recall that R3 was Sibos, there with Chainlink at the beginning. Their demos, as in your pic, also seemed to use Chainlink.

Sergey has been continuously talking about CBDCs using DLT & oracles for over a year now. Leads me to believe they've actually had serious CBDC talks with relevant parties, demos, POCs, etc.

We will see, we will see....

Following up this, a "Corda node" could just mean a Chainlink node owned & operated by Corda & running additional Corda software, similar to the node operators we already know and love.

isn't it explicitly implied that corda requires chainlink for all web3/smart contract use cases? it is also implied that they can utilize other "oracles", but people will eventually realize that chainlink is the industry standard and enterprise will just use link oracles, "enterprise node" = using link middleware = participating in link tokenomics

Great cope, im with u tho

Buy XDC

Attached: 1637635638211-1.png (1923x1238, 50.34K)

kek

>explicitly implied
They can use their own homespun oracles, there's nothing stopping them. I agree Chainlink is the obvious choice, doesn't mean it's guaranteed though. The history between R3 and Chainlink and Sergey talking about CBDCs all the time leads me to believe Chainlink is likely, but we just won't know until there's a live working product

U are not wrong. I am just saying that that it all takes so much longer as (i) expected. By the looks of it a simple test version of CBDC still doesn't even use the standard. I know it will come but god damn.

This is indeed a bit of hopium.
Accenture makes CBDC Software/platform.
Kinda sad that after 4 years after R3 crumbs we still talk about such crumbs instead of hard evidence/confirmed usage of Chainlink.

>accenture.com/us-en/blogs/blockchain-mps/cbdc-for-commercial-banks-part-2-how-to-prepare
This is their latest blog about it from march 22'

Attached: 1641480940558.jpg (1920x1080, 489.16K)

it's kind of ogre. i'm selling all but one makeit stack

why would you expect them to open the rails to a trillion dollar heavily disrupted industry without any guards in place? they will own it one way or another, a significant and perhaps lightly understated aspect of investing in web3/blockchain/smart contract tangential businesses is as a literal hedge against the bug pod world they're preparing for everyone as a consolation once our current system has been immolated enough to be "built back better"

Yea good point

doom aside I think the lions share of wealth creation that unlocking interop with legacy data, derivatives, and really the internet of everything; has yet to truly begin