The rooms are about $30,000 each, including the cost of additional services and buildings

>The rooms are about $30,000 each, including the cost of additional services and buildings.
>Each tiny home costs around $15,000 to build.

You can live in San Francisco and L.A. for 30k, would you do it?

Attached: prefab.png (1206x817, 1.13M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZC1T_nzkSwA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You VIL buy the pod for you savings of 10 Years Waging

Attached: vx.jpg (635x752, 60.54K)

>buy
These are free for the homeless. The question I want to ask is why didn’t they build these on cheaper property? Why would San Francisco-ans want to retain their homeless?

>living on a parking garage
peak american

Boomer Nimby's are the cause of every economic calamity in the past 70 years.

Bc they're actually retarded

hilarious that wagies are expected to work 60 hours a week and house/room share in the most remote and niggerlicious parts of the city while enduring long commutes to their miserable wagecuck job while homeless drug addicts are given free non-shared housing in downtown areas.

My question is why do homeless San Franciscans choose to stay in the most expensive city on earth instead of moving somewhere else?

I would pay double that to have this in a not-shithole city like Copenhagen or Munich.

isnt the real answer the move these people outside of the city?

Yes, but you get a cozy bed, a nice desk to WFH on, no kitchen but you are within walking distance of lots of good restaurants. Good for NEETS who don't know how to cook.

Attached: podbed.png (810x619, 887.05K)

>what would a homeless person like to eat?
>I know! How about a couple of nice Toblerones!

the absolute state of California

>pre move in pic
post move in pic attached

Attached: 0928340982304.png (742x341, 475.81K)

For poor people, cooking at home is one of the most effective ways to save money. I know "beans and rice" is a meme but it's genuinely one of the cheapest ways to get a lot of nutrients/protein/carbs and costs less than a dollar for a filling portion.

I spent $145.000 on this?

youtube.com/watch?v=ZC1T_nzkSwA

> 3:50
> "unfortunately it's all in Ukrainian so I can't read it"
> spends six figures on a property in Ukraine
???

>tiny home village

you can literally fit 10x more people in a Khrushchyovka for the same area and a quarter of the price. wtf is wrong with americans

Attached: Panel_Khrushchev_house_in_Tomsk.jpg (2048x1536, 706.91K)

If a homeless person climbed up, fell down from their upper levels and got injured, they would be able to sue the state for accessibility issues

Most homeless people are just dysfunctional mentally ill people that cannot live anywhere without recking it.

I hope an user close to the give an update 30 days later lol. It's gonna be a shithole and news won't cover it

Because they provide Perks like being allowed to shit in the streets and now building them shelter.

>heh why would you have a glass door in a poor area
>oh, it's because some of those don't have windows

It'll probably burn down

this is going to end badly.
they are going to just become ghettos with junkies and criminals.
basically a no-go area.
also, if they were smart, they would have made it a few stories high.
you can make the rooms small, but youre still going to need more land if you dont stack them.

what SF needs to do is come to the realization that their liberal policies and laws destroyed their city.

It's probably much harder to build in terms of plumbing/electricity/etc.

All the blacks will ruin it. It’ll literally just be Detroit 2.0

This is unironically part of it; my brother was homeless there for a period and he told me the police there were friendly to a fault and very accommodating. Add that plus mild weather all year around PLUS California’s pretty generous social services and you have a breeding ground for vagrants.