Sorry bulltards but no is buying

Entirely futures led move. Spot CVD hardly moved.

28k EOW screen cap this post.

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-03-01 at 12.08.52 pm.png (1818x880, 177.48K)

Elon Tweet imminent

I hate this crab, when bear market?

>no is buying
Shorts will

The entire move was shorts being opened and shorts being closed by liquidation engine. There's no room left for this fake out.

I will preface this by saying that yes I am a hurt under allocated bear who got rekt. Still more of my portfolio is allocated than not so I have more to gain if we pump.

Repeat after me Any Forums: This is an entirely fraudulent pump

Attached: FMuDLhDagAIQI6B.png (3227x1755, 173.78K)

Shorts already paid for the entire move up

Attached: 983.png (340x444, 103.25K)

Cope less

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-02-13 at 10.46.13 pm.png (260x324, 126.73K)

>28k EOW
I hope so that would be amazing buy opportunity. The more drops in price relative to this extreme highs gives more people time to average out their costs and get better entry points. Instead of oh god I bought at the top constantly. As volatility comes down the avg normie is getting fucked out of his position anymore.

Attached: 1643587944526.jpg (775x625, 334.27K)

i may have made the right move by selling my bags here. hopefully i don't rope

THANKS FOR THE CHEAPIES FAGGOT

Attached: 2.png (538x594, 89.42K)

>I will preface this by saying that yes I am a hurt under allocated bear who got rekt
based honest bear

What's a cvd

Thank you for improving the quality of Any Forums fren its been getting too bad lately
And yes even without the graph this pump felt fake as fuck
Add another reminder not to use degen leverage you idiots

actual rare good thread, no one replies

spot cvd is unchanged because there has been net neutral market buys/sells, whereas perps have a net market buy. why does this mean that short liquidations have funded the price increase? can't it be that longs have caused the rally and shorts have yet to cover?

bullshit, barely any shorts were liq'd. There was that retard who bought 15m at 44k and pushed the price, funding rate were bullish too.

>he thinks a 15 million buy would make btc go up by 6k
Kek

just looking at the indicators diverging doesnt mean shit, its what happens after the divergence.
when perps chase spot, you get shit chop liquidations, when spot chases perps you get a trend

>barely any shorts were liq'd
Is this true?
Am I retarded, then, for thinking bears must be demoralized before the price can hit that juicy 20-28k mark? Let's say we violently rip up to 50-60k with a 'rusky oligarchs are buying' narrative. Then, when enough bears get liq'd or panic close, we continue down.

Are there even enough bears to warrant such deviousness?

>He doesn't know about supply shock

Attached: 1634398539841.jpg (250x233, 8.71K)