Why is Apu3 mooning and chainlink isn’t?

Attached: 797743A4-C6DD-4AA0-8EA9-84DB4FD8D6C2.jpg (1746x872, 98.3K)

Other urls found in this thread:

medium.com/api3/where-are-the-first-party-oracles-5078cebaf17
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

API is up from $3 to $9
Link is down from $50 to $14

Why?

>why
staking live
beacons in testnet
token insurance live @ denver
token earning mechanisms live @ denver
>token needed

lower mcap so easier to pump and theyre supposedly doing shit at ethdenver

Chainlink does all that and more

Same reason you’re pointing it out

also api3 is new to normies whereas everyone has already met Jason Parser

It has actual use cases and a competent team. Chain link isn’t even needed and they take all the money they make to give roasties 300k a year salaries. You would have to be a legit regard to hold link if you didn’t buy it sub $7 and sell when it mooned. Only people still holding will be perpetual bag holders holding a shitcoin that crabs at best and dumps at worst. Seriously link holders are stupid as fuck

>Chainlink does all that and more
chainlink dosnt have insurance model. never.
chainlink dosnt have staking live. yet.

for api3 you stake for insurance in link you stake for cryptoeconomic dollar security vs sybil attacks which funnily enough is completely irrelevant in api3 since there is no seperate oracle layer to attack.
>Chainlink does all that and more
api3 dosnt do what ccip does but it does what price feeds etc do a lot more better than link.

Because the token for apu3 is actually needed and this valuable

Lotta ESL in this bread

>Chainlink does all that and more
>api3 dosnt do what ccip does but it does what price feeds etc do a lot more better than link.
How?

>How?
see third party vs first party oracle

API3 is demonstrably a better oracle. If you did some research outside of Any Forums you would understand why

because api3 token has actual use cases
chainlink token doesn't

Kek
Seething begins

Attached: 85B858C1-E8A9-409C-A143-3EFCCD56ABDF.png (500x442, 165.03K)

Link integrations: 1100+
APU3 integrations: 42
Cope and seethe

3-9
52-14

>number of integrations determines quality of an oracle
The Any Forums reaction to API3 overtaking LINK is going to be hilarious.

We all learned from this bullrun that price action means jack shit when it comes to project importance.

Attached: EF17244E-6355-4311-8E96-80266F8206B1.png (769x463, 437.19K)

Nah dude. Companies want to use shitty oracles and waste their money away.

Attached: 9A8E2E37-0B77-4791-A93B-05967D80ABC6.jpg (495x386, 177.01K)

Because it’s not suppressed.

cope. API3 provides better data feeds than chainlink. It is currently objectively more useful than chainlink. As the other user said, look at the difference between first and third party oracles. API3 is the chainlink killer.

>number of services that want to integrate an oracle suggests the quality of the oracle
Yeah that's pretty accurate.

>x is the chainlink killer
Damn. I haven’t read this since back in 2019. How time flies.

Attached: 2D96EED7-4531-404C-BBAD-E50FA392E826.jpg (1000x887, 142.5K)

link me something
or explain
otherwise just collect your rupees for shilling and fuck off

medium.com/api3/where-are-the-first-party-oracles-5078cebaf17
This can get you started. Soon enough you'll understand why API3 will inevitably overtake and kill chainlink.

i'm conviced you're one of the 4 bagholders left. I recognise your images and file names

It's over bros, our Chainlink journey ends here. The Great Reset timeline has come at a crossroad with humanity. The magic is gone, the memes are stale, the shills have been uncovered, the agendas laid bare for all to see, i-i-it's over marines...only tears from here.

Attached: cry.jpg (223x221, 13.33K)

kek. Link baggies are the most pathetic group on this board.

such great detective!
no one is selling you retard kek

Attached: 1641683010605.jpg (538x609, 61.16K)

These are the only points he lists in that article that differ between Chainlink and API3. The only reason he prefers API3 is ironically because the LINK token is needed.

Attached: AcfzUEM.png (752x584, 55.73K)

>project importance
i personally don’t know of any markets or vendors that accept “project importance” as currency

It's pretty easy to see you're lying

This is a link board. Deal with it.

>no one holds link on /link/
Did you just started browsing this morning?