THIS

THIS

Attached: F8EC9FE0-AC0A-455C-8B42-EB534FE6084F.jpg (1170x528, 68.07K)

Sting is better than Carder, yes sir

Epa you are pushing it dude

Bretcucks and Stingcels.

Sting never had matches similar to what Taker had.
But at the end of the day both were lazy fucks who lucked into easy gimmicks that require little work.

Only the droniest of drones put that much stock on Mean Mark.

>soars toward u

Attached: gg74.jpg (228x221, 5.12K)

True

Trips confirm

Your opinion is the worst of all

Attached: 1600821981017.png (600x409, 463.67K)

Sting had two years where he did nothing but stare down from the rafters.
Wow, such greatness.

All memes aside Sting is nowhere near Taker but his end of career is 10x better

FED = BAD

Go back goofie

kek stink SUCKS. The best years of his career were when no one had to hear his cringe promos

Ok you do it, and tell me how many people call you the goat

True. Shawn got propped up by DX and the Attitude Era. Bret was always better than him. And Sting was not only a better worker and talker, but he was always better than Carder.

whatever floats your boat

Word

Undertaker wrestled one match on average a year for the last 10 years of his career. And his last 10 matches were 1 star almost fatal botch heavy circuses

Word

He's right you know