*kills any possible interest the public has for crypto as a whole*

I have to admit I'm getting a bit nervous that the general public attitude towards crypto seems to have shifted drastically from enthusiasm towards mockery.

you should be happy about that, friend.
will make this bear market less long the faster it happens

You really overestimate the power a balding fat youtuber talking about shit for two and a half hours has on a trillion dollar market.

The only people that care about this video are those that already hate crypto and needed a guy pretending to be clever to find reasons to hate it, because they cannot say 'Ugly monkey made people money' and the environment argument was getting old.

Attached: 1643489805342.jpg (1290x1935, 294.07K)

How can impoverished Afghan women make use of aid in crypto?

YOWZA!! *Token oppressed people* are benefitting from crypto according to this random headline. wtf, I now love crypto and NFT's

This is bullish user. Normies are going to snap at the obvious cuck telling them to stop buying gorilla pictures and to go vote for Joe Biden.

As you should. You're running out of bigger fools, fast.

It is not all a ponzi scheme though
NFTs offer solutions for real world problems

*fidgets*

Attached: Fidgets.jpg (263x210, 5.68K)

>over 2 hours long

fucking hell, can someone summarise it in one paragraph?

this

>this dude BTFO'd crypto entirely
He got every single technical point wrong.

>Libertarians/Austrians/whatever think the 2008 crisis was caused because of "too much regulation", they're filled by a trust in markets and decentralization
If you actually looked at what people say in these circles it's not about "too much regulation", it's that the Fed's artificially low interest rates caused an enormous bubble that popped when all the cheap money eventually ran out.
>Bitcoin takes 6 hours to process as many transactions as Visa processes in one minute, while consuming similar amounts of energy
Technically true, but it's because of the hard-limit on the block size, not because of the nature of the blockchain. Literally every single other coin solved this problem and can process thousands of transactions per second. He makes the viewer think that blockchains are just wasteful by nature, which is incredibly disingenuous.
Not to mention that even if that was true, the negative externalities of current fiat and banking are much worse than just "emitting CO2". For example, wars would be much harder to finance without printing.
>A handful of groups control 95% of all mining, so they can do what they want and it's all centralized again
The part about how "they can do whatever they want" is completely false. They can't print BTC out of nowhere, for example, In fact the only power they have is the power to nuke the network, that's all.
>Ethereum is extremely inefficient with high gas prices
We'll see as time goes on. He presents this as something inherent and a permanent but it's not, it's the #1 priority of the foundation at the moment.
>Blockchains are public by nature and there's no circumventing that
XMR? Taproot? Polkadot? Again he presents as if this problem is inevitable and by nature but it's not, it's circumventable. There are plenty of ways to bring anonymity to the blockchain.

I hit the character limit but there are plenty more.