Rubic just bypassed Arbitrum’s delay period.
Link = $100 eoy
Rubic = $20 eoy
Rubic just bypassed Arbitrum’s delay period
Jaxson Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
Wyatt Lee
but they will never market
Elijah Richardson
50$ eoy
Parker Russell
Bentley Rogers
I’m sure there are dozens of people that are excited about this
Nathaniel Hughes
wow good news for both chainlinks and rubic communities, very excite
lets see how many years rubic will take to implement CCIP after its release
Wyatt Adams
checked, wagmi
Noah Martinez
Rubic got staking faster than linkshit
Dominic Peterson
Nigger is spelled with 6 letters
Rubic is spelled with 5
5+6 = 11
Vladimir is spelt with 8 letters
Rubic is 1 product
8+1 =9
Israel paid Iraq in Rubic to fly jets filled with api calls into the Eiffel Tower
Matthew Gray
whos and whats it
Carter Diaz
Nathaniel James
checked
Rubic integrated Arbitrum yesterday
Sebastian Lewis
What is coming next?
Jordan Jones
Holy shit, checked
Oliver Cruz
You think generic shitcoin staking is as complex as chainlinks staking?
Julian Rodriguez
lol rubic just uses arbitrum no partnership
Luke Wood
What's wrong with Rubic? Why is it performing so poorly?
Samuel Peterson
Part 2 of the j curve
Aaron Adams
I don't mean in terms of TA. I mean in terms of value proposition.
Does it not deliver on what it promised or did it promise something that no one actually needs?
Charles Perez
who cares? Other bridge protocols that are actually used already did this.
David Brooks
>Does it not deliver on what it promised or did it promise something that no one actually needs?
It's the most fascinating combination of both. The market segment looking for any token cross ghost chain instant swaps is extremely small. 95% of the very small target market bridge stables and/ or network fuel on real native bridges and dexes.
Also, rubic doesn't even deliver. It makes api calls to real bridges and dexes, it uses usdc for crosschain, and the rbc tkn is totally functionless on platform.
Ultimate Any Forums midwit trap.
Easton Anderson
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks.