Every other legitimate project just involves leveraging, liquidity, or saving jpegs.
Numerai is the intersection of quantitative finance, crypto, and artificial intelligence. It’s goal is to become the last hedge fund. The team is aligned with Elon in the belief that the worlds smartest minds used to put men on the moon, now they all join hedge funds. Numerai ends that. It is a crowd sourced hedge fund that is being fed machine learning model outputs from the smartest machine learning engineers and data scientists. It is US based. Numerai probably has the biggest moat in crypto. Everyone is focused on developer activity and not machine learning engineer activity. It predates ethereums launch and is the leading artificial intelligence crypto project by a large margin.
It’s not really a controversial statement, but few big personalities in tech have the balls to admit it. The smartest people in the world are joining hedge funds, and it is crushing innovation. Numerai will have the edge against all hedge funds, since it is an altruistic with thousands of crowd sourced signals and machine learning models. They just beat every market neutral hedge fund competitor last quarter.
Bentley Green
>Numerai will have the edge against all hedge funds Have you ever heard of Renaissance Technologies, try to look into the market you're investing in before making retarded claims like that.
Owen James
Howard Morgan, founder of Renaissance, heavily invested in Numerai.
Many other big names in tech support this including naval. This project is literally a sleeping giant. Quant investors are skeptical of crypto so they pass it. Crypto holders don’t understand machine learning so they pass it. Those who follow Artificial Intelligence write off AI Crypto projects because all of the initial projects were scams.
This coin has an altruistic vision, which will give it a cult following. Any Forums should take notice before wallstreetbets finds out. They all hate hedge funds.
Aaron Gomez
fuck howard, call me if jim talks about it
Noah Green
I'm just larping by the way, I like what Numerai is doing but I'm not buying their token.
Robert Scott
Pretend I don't understand anything you said. What does this do and will it outperform Doge?
Hunter Moore
how it is minted and who owns most of mkcap? the token is needed for?
James Peterson
It’s a risky play, I get it. It took them a while to get the tokenomics right, since running these machine learning models is so expensive. But in this era that Crypto Is in, if a project has huge potential and 100% sound economics, Crypto funds have likely priced you out of a 100x.
Alexander Green
>But in this era that Crypto Is in, if a project has huge potential and 100% sound economics, Crypto funds have likely priced you out of a 100x. I fundamentally disagree with this, I can give you an example of a project that literally has 1000x potential that no fund has even on their radar. Crypto is full of retards.
Cameron Cook
Idk. Doge could always fuck around and overtake bitcoin because it’s funny. I like both
The token is needed for staking when you submit your machine learning model’s prediction on the market. Models that were useful get rewarded, others get slashed.
Juan Wilson
Do it then
Juan Carter
I’d love to hear it. The few cases where I’ve seen a very small Chance of a 50-75x return, the coin has a huge diluted market cap. You wouldn’t have the exit liquidity to ever sell.
Chase Hall
I see. Casino coins where the casino owns all the coins, right? If you've got a winning strategy why publish for some casino coins?
Brody Jackson
Sure, I've been full time researching base layer protocols since the start of last year, looked at literally every single protocol and spend a lot of time comparing them, also checked what the biggest funds and research organizations have been saying on this, the thing I found out was that there is that all crypto funds are retarded to the core, the only thing they care about is getting VC allocations to dump on retail. They do not give a fuck about fundamental technology, otherwise solana would have gotten 0 funding (their pitches back then were completely detached from reality there was no way they would have gotten any funding if VC cared for anything other than dumping on the greater fool).
To make you guys understand I'll have to quickly explain how base layers can scale. >Big blocks I'm assuming everyone here knows why this is retarded so I won't explain why big blocks cause all kinds of problems >Not using a blockchain And instead use DAGs and other meme structures to achieve some extra scalability. Problem is that DAGs have the fatal flaw of the "small world" problem in that a killer dapp actually constricts the overall network performance. This is why DAGs are not used for scaling in high frequency trading/finance, even though the industry tried them out in the 90s... DAGs suck at scaling in production BUT they make for fantastic performance demos and POCs... which is why finance bothered to try them in the first place (this was in the era before the senior leadership at funds were tech/eng types and didn't know better) >Layer 2 This is the latest 5 year research project that the ethereum foundation came up with, it's a ridiculous band-aid solution to an unscalable base layer and will not result in scalability improvements in any meaningful way (beyond making gas a little cheaper in exchange for centralization). Even if there was a perfect L2 solution, if L1 can't scale then you'll still be congested. >Sharding cont
State Sharding is, in theory, a perfect solution, it's decentralized, and it's infinitely scalable, Sharding has been used to scale databases since forever, so we know it works. Imagine google scaling their databases with L2, it's completely ridiculous yet that's what the EF foundation claims is going to be the endgame of blockchain kek. Problem however, is that sharding decreases security the more shards are added and would come with scaling constraints if = more shards = more cross shard communication = less scaling. Because that's what current PoS based sharding projects are running into, harmony needs a beacon chain to mitigate coss chain scaling problems, and has no solution to security loss, cosmos and dot know that this doesn't work and went with hub-spoke which comes with the same cross chain problems and a bunch more that also apply to L2.
Now
Wouldn't it be funny, if there was one protocol that retains security as it scales, and came up with a clean way to solve for cross chain scaling problems. And wouldn't it be funny if almost no fucking VC fund even knew it existed. Wouldn't it be funny if there was only one protocol on the entire market that actually figured out the 10 year old problem of how to scale a blockchain, and nobody knows. And wouldn't it be funny if it worked right now and isn't vaporware like ETH2. I mean, it would be pretty funny.
I knew this was a kadena shill before you even posted the link. Now im inclined to discard everything else you said. No KDA isnt getting a 1 trillion $ marketcap, and its certainly not the solution to everything. You really ruined your credibility by adding how we should buy your bags. And it even looked like you might have a point worth exploring with the stuff you wrote on crypto funds.
Jordan Bailey
I think I was very clear in my explanation, if you want you can explain how I'm wrong and how the only scalable L1 can't get to a 1T mkt cap within the next decade. I would be more than excited to hear you come up with a reason, because I am pretty sure there is not a single one.
Hope you went all in with all of your savings, but not before getting a loan from the bank and all of your friends and family then. Your " explanation" was simply the extremely biased account of a bagholder trying to cope with being overinvested. I dont need to convince you of anything, not like that would be possible, you are WAY too far gone for that. I look athe market objectively and try to make smart decisions. People like you who overinvest financially and emotionally will end up losing everything.
