Hello Any Forums
Welcome to Conspiracy Theory with me, Jesse Ventura
Today we want to discuss the JFK assassination.
Hello Any Forums
Welcome to Conspiracy Theory with me, Jesse Ventura
Today we want to discuss the JFK assassination.
If your child died storming the beaches of France, how would you feel if the president of the United States went on television and declared that the rocket scientists granted a pardon who worked for the SS in Nazi Germany were handed unlimited taxpayer money to go to "the moon?"
George Bush senior orchestrated the entire assassination.
If that image is true, then JFK was really, really stupid.
I've heard this before, however why didn't Elizabeth II meet with Lyndon Johnson?
Let's put it into perspective
If you continue down this road you will be silenced by the zogbots
he wouldnt give more nuclear detonaters and Mossad killed him. Bestest Ally.
Every time I see Jesse Ventura I just imagine him saying "I was the governor of Minnesota"
>muh hekin jooooooooooos we must protect da joooooooos for democracy
Because only the USA and the USSR having nuclear weapons was a wonderful balance of power.
The shills will abandon this thread because of THIS:
YES.
Countries can develop them but religions cannot.
Did JFK really announce publicly intentions to shut down the CIA?
>Countries can develop them but religions cannot.
Then how can it be allowed for an Ayatollah to possess one? Wouldn't a proper hereditary Shah be necessary for Iran to be allowed to develop a small arsenal?
One theory…
>there are many others, which s the correct one?
Not really anything solid on the motives. However, Oswald wasn't alone, if he was even involved that is. Warren commission setup a deck at the same height with the same speed of moving target, same rifle. They let an average person attempt to get the same amount of rounds off as accurately as oswald on the same amount of time. They ofcourse failed they then let a soldier try to emulate the feat. He couldn't do it. They then got an expert marksman to try and nothing. Oswald was a marine sniper, but that feat of marksmanship was impossible with that bolt action in the given time that the rounds were fired. Also, imagine the amount of adrenaline pumping through the shooter and the pressure, which the test participants wouldn't have had to deal with and they still all failed. In conjunction with the obvious 'back and to the left' and the fact that the woman recording across the street from zapruder with a view of the grassy Knowle and the underpass had her footage immediately sized tells me that there were at least two shooters and oswald didn't fire the fatal shot. Whoever was in the book store depository got him through the neck and whoever was in front of him blew the brains out the back of his head. As for the conspiracy element I suggest you watch a talk by Dr Cyril wecht called a case for conspiracy. That's all I've got.
Fundamentally, I believe that we will never know the true reasons why, who or how the events on that November day happened as they did. That's why I stay away from it and 9/11. Us plebs are never going to know the truth.
>Not really anything solid on the motives.
Motive is everything.
>That's why I stay away from it and 9/11.
Hmm.
Yeah.
Not saying you should stay away from it. Look into it by all means. Just saying that I tend tend get sucked into it and find myself knowing more about the events and somehow further from the truth as the more you learn the more complex, contradictory or odd things become. I think this is because there has been serious efforts, likely from government agencies, to obfuscate and make elusive the facts of the matter and what actually happened and so when you try to look into it properly you have to wade through all of the useless or misleading shit that has been put out there. It doesn't help that most people fall for said shit, write books about it and add to it. I have accepted that I will likely never know what happened. At least I know that something was not right, unlike many who believe exactly what they have been told. I have my suspicions as to who and why but, as I said, nothing concrete.
Post chin with handwritten timestamp so we know its you.
I may be wrong about the soldier in the warren commissions tests. I know that they brought in people of varying abilities. An expert marksman was definitely brought in, I remember that much. He was likely a much better shooter than oswald and he couldn't do it. Also, some more on the conspiracy side: the later held committee on assassinations who investigated the killings of both JFK and MLK (LBJ was on this committee) concluded that there was a conspiracy. The earlier Warren commission
came to the opposite conclusion and was later found to have a memeber in their investigation planted there to steer the conclusion away from conspiracy whilst eyes were still on it. He was named but I forget his name. Something to think about.
>I may be wrong about the soldier in the warren commissions tests.
Yeah. Oswald was an anti-communist FBI agent who only defected to Russia to establish credibility.
Part of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax was to hide this from Trump by suggesting he may be compromised.
But there are many more dirty secrets they were hiding about Russia, including the hoax itself.
By 'wrong about the soldier in the tests'
I was saying that I cannot recall if they had a soldier try to replicate the marksmanship, not talking about any motives as you are.