Suggest me a fallacy

Can anybody suggest me a video or a political debate, or campaign that uses fallacies like Slippery slope, ad hominem, strawman and etc.?

Attached: Fallacy.png (1333x1000, 507.96K)

We're not doing your homework for you. Go find it yourself before I trace your IP and tell your teacher that you asked a mongolian nigger-hating forum.

>slippery slope
With the troon grooming occuring now, i am not so aure about this one anymore.

You're not wrong if you use logical fallacies, you're just manipulative. Whoever can solidify their point using the most logical fallacies while getting away with it is generally the more dominant and successful person.

Tl;dr, nobody cares if you're right, because might is right.

Just debate people on Reddit and you will find logical fallacies galore

No I can't you fucking faggot because as everyone knows already logical fallacies aren't real, it is just something in your head.

>i am not so aure about this one anymore.
It never was a fallacy. That only works when incremental change isn't being driven by some kikes

>already logical fallacies aren't real,

Attached: ex3xwox6cmr11.png (1083x1128, 33.9K)

Just read practically any post here for myriad examples of logical fallacies.

It’s mostly Jewish rhetoric. Avoiding ad hominem is a rule of thumb and straw man is useful for gaslighting anyone kek. But in general only midwits care about so called logical fallacies.

>But in general only midwits care about so called logical fallacies.

Attached: fnfnj66rlz031.jpg (1462x2046, 120.98K)

Oy vey goyim, accepting homosexuals has nothing to do with why a perverted man dressed as a demonic drag queen is grinding his punishment on your 6 year old at public school events. Slippery slope is false.

climate change
>coorelation equals causation
vax mandate
>appeal to authority
>false dilemma
Ivermectin
>Appeal to ridicule
Safe and effective
>Begging the question

I think the list is shorter to ask for a current political debate which isn't a logical fallacy

Watch CNN, or listen to NPR for 5 minutes.

I should probably illustrate with examples
>CO2 is increasing as temperatures are, therefore CO2 is the cause of increasing temperatures
>Trust the science
>Either get vaccinated, or catch covid
>Of course it's safe and effective, because the news media told me so. The news media hasn't reported on any negative side effects, therefore it must be safe and effective.

oops, forgot
>Horse paste!

Watch literally any form of political content on jewtube.

Ad Hominem is not a fallacy. If a person making an argument is disingenuous than the argument itself is compromised and not worth addressing. You don't play with cheaters.

If you unironically debate people, you are a reddit nigger.

Slippery slope is only a fallacy when there is no slope. In other words: if there wasn't an obvious, well documented and widely leaked agenda, and clear real world decades long matching progression to use civil then gay then tranny rights to lead to child grooming and pedo rights, maybe you could have argued back in the day that not stoning gays won't *necessarily* lead to children being mutilated sterilised raped and eaten.

In reality, it's like saying "I know we have the invasions plans, and real world historical experiences and they say that crossing this border is the most important step to invading the country, but that doesn't mean we should assume that if they cross this border there is a danger of them invading the country.."

It's fucking retarded.

The only real fallacy about slippery slopes is that they are always a fallacy.

>You're not wrong if you use logical fallacies
yeah you are wrong if someone knows you use them. That's why you use them only when talking to brainlets