If I've been here since 2015 what are the odds that Styx has called me a nigger before on this board

If I've been here since 2015 what are the odds that Styx has called me a nigger before on this board

Attached: styx.jpg (4305x2835, 540.67K)

hello fellow oldfag

fuck that faggot

You just did, styx

I will never let another person who I could easily snap in half influence my opinions.

ive been onthis stupid website since like 2007

Nigger

OP is a bundle of Styx

1 in 7

I trolled styx on th rogan board in 2012-13 and got
Banned. Those were better times for all of us

Attached: 98F72FE1-1E1E-4C0D-9D5F-7952E0DD3E91.jpg (1020x796, 237.75K)

more like 10 in 2.

is he a lolcow?

That dude is basically asmongold if instead of WoW he would have got into politics lmao

100%

Attached: Styx.jpg (125x93, 2.93K)

I still remember when Styx posted a thread here asking our opinion if he should start vlogging on youtube.

pic unrelated.

Attached: bly_centaur2s.jpg (640x577, 96.48K)

You're a silly nigger and who cares about that hippie faggot

Asmongold is unironically more intelligent than this trannoid retard

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

I like Styx. He's reasonable.

Saved the thumbnail...

>2015
>oldfag

Fuck off newfag faggot. If you're not from before 2010 you are a literal reddit tier nigger, kike or zoomer

>says allowing children the right to engage in sexual activity is a violation of their NAP
Fake libertarian, doesn't support children's bodily autonomy. I suppose the underlying assumption is that sex is irrevocably link to harm when children are involved, but no empirical evidence supports this conclusion.
Sex, when consented to, carries no special propensity to cause harm, which has been the result of every study investigating "child sexual abuse".
Preventing children from engaging in consensual sexual activity is a violation of their NAP.

Attached: RindConceptValidity.jpg (1612x711, 374.06K)

>what are the odds
not zero