Why are we against faggots again?

Why are we against faggots again?

I mean they are a self destructive "people"
They are ending their blood line because of their degeneracy

Making it only the elite who are pro creating
Slowly killing the degeneracy in the west

>But they are indoctrinating muh kids with troon ideology
My brother in Christ, they did that before faggots where mainstream just with different subjects [Tax, Feminism, goverment, Holocaust, etc]

Take your kids to a private school, or get a private teacher.

Bros we are going to win no matter what.

Attached: faggotFlag.png (261x161, 348)

This statement is based on the false premise that there is a single, unified reason why people hate gays. This is simply not the case. There are a variety of reasons why people may dislike or even hate gays, and to lump all of these reasons together is unfair and disingenuous.

Some people may dislike gays because they believe that homosexuality is immoral. Others may dislike gays because they believe that homosexuality is unnatural. Still others may dislike gays simply because they are uncomfortable with the idea of two people of the same gender being intimate with one another.

Regardless of the reason, it is important to remember that not all people who dislike or hate gays are bigots. Some people may simply have different opinions or beliefs about homosexuality.

>private school
same thing, homeschool them and give them a proper traditional education.

On paper they claim that gay men are sex abusers and predators, and this gives them casus belli for violence. Though they don't care about the massive amounts of sex abuse in their own communities of course.

I honestly do think there's a deeper psychological reason for right-wing homophobia, but I'm not the one to diagnose that

Get off my thread faggot

Attached: aimingGun.png (600x610, 216.92K)

The bot triggered me, yes they are bigots if they hate gay people

Slippery slope is real. My grandpa warned me at 11. Cock suckers like kids and they will go after them

Because they're disgusting, same reason you hate shit on your sidewalk.
Shit on your sidewalk will decay and "fix" itself but it's disgusting and even if it eventually fixes itself it's still there being disgusting.

Attached: 1660761680567956.png (1080x1266, 697K)

No, most pedophiles are heterosexual

>per capita
Per capita numbers involve grouping together out gay men who are attracted to adult men......with straight identified men who are attracted to adult women but also abuse boys on the side (and show zero attraction to adult men in phallometric measurements)

Also a side of using boomer-tier "2% of the population is gay" stats for good measure

Attached: rainbow-flag-figure-cropped.jpg (620x893, 76.18K)

>Why are we against faggots again?

Attached: 1661292830612075.webm (576x1024, 2.79M)

>No, most pedophiles are heterosexual
It's the dipshit again. Listen dumbass, when a man has sexual relations with a boy it's a homosexual act.

How would you feel if picrel was 2 men and a rainbow flag?

Uh huh same way if a man fucks a male dog its a 'homosexual act' but if he's otherwise attracted to adult women (and not to adult men) and gay men in general want nothing to do with dogs, he's essentially a perverse straight man.

The ONLY reason to lump in a straight-identified married, female-attracted pedophile who abuses boys with gay adult men who like men is because you want an excuse to commit violence against gay men.

forgot pic

Attached: 1662215572281441.jpg (1200x1725, 1.1M)

"Pedophile" is a modern newspeak.
Our (and your) ancestors used to fuck little boys and girls.
People got married in early teens and even pre teen.
It was completely normal for a rich man to go spend bucks on child sex slaves.
This all got trashed once "adult" "women" were given votes.

>How would you feel if picrel was 2 men and a rainbow flag?
Disgust but on not in a level as this pic. Unless those gay men support shit like this
>Uh huh
Lol, you are a faggot
>same way if a man fucks a male dog its a 'homosexual act
Is that what we're talking about? Sure isn't. Strawman less disingenuous dipshit
>The ONLY reason to lump in a straight-identified married
>indentiefied
I don't give a shit about how one "identifies" I care about their actions. A man having sexual relations with a boy is a homosexual act, period

>Our (and your) ancestors used to fuck little boys and girls.
Luckily society has changed to not fo that do this bullshit argument is just that, bullshit.

>Take your kids to a private school, or get a private teacher.
That's extremely expensive

A man married to a woman and attracted to women and NOT attracted to men is a straight man period.

>would have
All you faggots do is sow and manufacture fear. You are fear merchants

>A man married to a woman and attracted to women and NOT attracted to men is a straight man period.
Yup, until he has sexual relations with another male.

Explain logically why it is bullshit.
>because LE BAD
You can't.
You can sperg all day long how it's "disgusting" or "repulsive" but it doesn't change the fact that females release most of their eggs during their teens and by the time they hit twenties it almost gets halved.
You are just an NPC reacting to emotions.

because homosexuals are statistically more likely to abuse children and spread diseases, you are never going to completely get rid of it, but society could not be promoting and encouraging it like it is now.

>Why are we against faggots again?
Because they’re narcissist fetishists for whom it’ll never be enough that their fetishes got the privilege status of ‘sexuality’
Or that it’s accepted and protected by law
Or that it’s normalised
Or that they can ‘’’’marry’’’’
Or that it’s represented in all media
They will always bite the hand that feeds them, they will always be perpetual victims whose fetish-based choices you’ve gotta accommodate for.
it is never enough because they’re fighting against the very natural disgust at them

Give an inch, they take a mile

Attached: B2230BA6-D239-48E6-A7A0-096BE3B2C042.jpg (1886x664, 191.01K)