ITT we discuss the veracity of the claim man landed on the moon.
If it was faked, why, how, and for what purpose? How do we know this? Same question for it being legitimate, how do we know for sure? Discuss
Moon landing, fake or real?
Nolan Jones
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
Oliver Hughes
Where are the amateur or independent telescope images of the landing sites? Real photos taken by third parties. Or even third party countries.
Jose Bailey
Yes it really happened. Don't fall for shit like this and flat earth bullshit, it's a psyop to distract and discredit from the real shady shit going on.
Dylan Harris
moon landing happened and people only deny it to undermine American supremacy. literally an anti American jewish op. further more OP is a faggot
William Johnson
Fake, Miroslaw Hermaszewski even confirms it is flat as many think.
youtu.be
Elijah Hughes
The flat earth huh, go on
Wyatt Powell
Whether we landed or not most of not all of the footage was faked. We were in a race with Russia for space superiority. Russia had the lead with the first orbiting satellite, first critter and man in space. It was a huge lead and the US looked to be the follower. In order to become the leader the US had to leap beyond anything Russia had done which became first man on the moon. There was no guarantee that film could make it through the Van Allen belt unscathed, TV footage was even less likely. Audio transmission only wasn't proof of anything beyond an active imagination because the world was already used to radio programming for entertainment. Video footage was the only proof that could and would be accepted by the world of this feat. The only way to ensure that the moon landing would and could be televised would be to shoot the footage on Earth and have it prepared in the event true footage could not be provided. Did we go? I don't know and it doesn't really matter. There is ample evidence of the footage being fake and I just explained why it would have been.
Grayson Scott
Isaac Cook
This was a pretty good video - well the information in it was pretty good.
Aiden Collins
>Where are the amateur or independent telescope images of the landing sites? Real photos taken by third parties. Or even third party countries.
All over. Takes about $1,600 in equipment to get a good quality image of the different landing locations. The big problem is that the moon is moving very quickly on the scale of a telescope so you need automatic tacking to get a good image. It's at the uneasy point of being way too bright to see without a filter and trying to see something a few meters wide needs a long exposure time to build a high enough resolution image.
Lincoln Jackson
quads of truth
Brayden Powell
David Cook
Surely you will post one of these good quality images of the landing sites that any intermediate astronomer can take cause they aint' comin up on google.
Joshua Russell
they literally don't exist
Carson King
Imagine 12 people going to the moon, and no one thinks of taking a proper selfie or proper picture of the earth. Instead you have thusands of pictures of random gravel and rocks.
Julian Harris
I’ve never understood the fake crowd. If they made it to space, which they did, then the moon isn’t that much harder.
Levi Myers
I know, I had a 10" dobsonian for a number of years.
Anthony Martin
I don't get this. Why would he say that. He even looks ashamed
Justin Johnson
This guy has never used a telescope btw.
Spacetards automatically assume you can zoom into the landing site and flag when it's not possible.
Angel Cox
And don't forget this is 1.25 light seconds away and is of things about the size of a car.
Brody Thompson
This. Walking 10 miles is the same as walking several times around the earth.
Matthew Fisher
keep away from my moon humans.
Grayson Gomez
BRO THE DUST ON THE MOON DOESNT FALL BACK DOWN BECAUSE THERES NO ATMOSPHERE BRO
THATS WHY YOU DONT SEE DUST ON THE AIRCRAFT LEGS AFTER LANDING
Dominic Lee
X
Chase Lee
sure, lol. lmao even
Angel Wood
How is the moon not harder? It is 1000x further away, it has extreme radiation outside low earth orbit, micro meteorites, sun flares.
When they land on the earth, they come smashing down with parashutes in the ocean. When they land (and lift off) they do it with rockets.. how is that not exteemely hard?
Juan Cox
they can't break through the firmament and space is fake.
Jordan Ross
100% real but the Jews want you to think it was fake.
No telescope on Earth or in Earth orbit can resolve that amount of detail. We have photographed the landing sites from lunar orbit with the LRO though.
Theoretically I guess JWST miiiight be able to see them, but JWST orbits the Earth-moon L2 point so it has no chance of seeing the Apollo landing sites which are all on the near-side of the moon.
Jeremiah Hughes
It was both. Glow niggers contracted a fake landing to be filmed incase the broadcast equipment failed and they they landed on the moon for real. Some of the pictures and films were used interchangeably for years because big bureaucracy government is dumb.
Austin Stewart
>>This. Walking 10 miles is the same as walking several times around the earth.
In terms of energy you need about 9,500m/s of delta V to get into orbit, it takes about 6,000m/s to get to the surface of the moon safely. So it's like walking 2/3rd of the way around the Earth and saying yeah the rest wouldn't be that much harder.
Kayden Martin
Should be a flag on the moon get a telescope and find it
William Martin
not to mention that it is really just concrete powder and not moon dirt, kek.
>youtu.be
Michael Reyes
The Moon as an astronomical body is easier to deal with than the Earth. It's smaller so less gravity and has effectively zero atmosphere. Those are the two things you're fighting when dealing with landing and take off. The hardest part of getting somewhere in space is leaving Earth.
Justin Morgan
Why are moon landing believers so dishonest? They will straight up lie and say that you can see the moon landing sites with a telescope when it's simply impossible. You can automatically assume they have never used a telescope nor have an understanding of how optics works.
We're waiting for those amateur pictures of the moon landing sites, please post them.
Parker Brooks
Compare the Apollo photos of the lunar surface with the color and texture of cement powder.
William Gomez
There is a saying, "orbit is halfway to anywhere."
Because most of your delta-v budget is spent just getting into Earth orbit.
Zachary Clark
>Where are the amateur or independent telescope images of the landing sites?
>All over.
Brody Harris
There are some achieved threads with full explanation, anyway the most interesting topic is "coldspot and hotspot" in moon landing photos
Justin Hall
>dying of cancer all over
That's not how cancer works.
Noah Ortiz
Yes, powdered rock does in fact look like powdered rock. You do realize that the moon is made out of the same basic minerals as Earth right?
Colton Robinson
Americans are too fat and stupid to have ever achieved something as great as landing on the moon.
Matthew Murphy
That photo was taken with the LRO which orbits as low as 12 miles above the surface of the moon.
Aiden Sanders
This is literal nonsense.
Landon Ramirez
yes it is. my father in law just died from cancer, literally all over in every organ, a few months ago.
Angel Russell
Well yeah we stole all the germans to do the heavy lifting for the design work
Juan Reed
That's why they got Nazis
Samuel Mitchell
they used cement powder in a hangar as a sound stage for taking the moon landing in 1968
Michael Wood
That is stupid. Building a large rocket is not the big problem. There are more capable rockets today, Russia has always had a rocket that could leave LEO. SpaceX has it. If thats the hard part, they could just strap on whatever and land on the moon now then and go back.
How is your logical compass so off?
Angel Parker
We landed on the moon but some of the photos and videos (some, not all or even the majority) are probably fake and made of recycled training footage.
Buzz Aldrin (I think) got in trouble once because NASA used a fake photo for his Gemini space walk in one of the initial press releases.
But frankly speaking, it’d be a lot easier to actually go to the moon than to fake going to the moon and not have anyone realize or spill the beans.
Lincoln Morris
The holocaust is fake retards. Nazis arent real.
God Americans are dumb
Hudson King
Problem is none of the videos or photographic evidence of the moon landings are convincing enough. Moon only has 17% gravity of Earth so the astronauts should be able to jump 5x higher than on Earth, but in the video they act as if they're still under Earth gravity. The upcoming moon trip with astronauts should hopefully dispel some doubts, assuming they would livestream the whole thing.
Michael Baker
This
Landing on the moon is easy enough in kerbal space program that doing it with the technology of 50 years ago seems plausible to me. Not much has changed about the underlying physics of the engines and fuel since then, and even the computers of the time could certainly handle being a glorified calculator for some orbit calculations.
Nicholas Bennett
I have had cancer on my pancreas and my father has had it in multiple locations due to it being skin cancer. It doesn't spread like a disease it corrupts whatever it starts in and cause problems for that organ to perform.
Mason Harris
So that tiny white dot in the centre, which doesn't look much different from the white dots on the right hand side is proof that man walked on the moon? We'll ignore the fact you said anyone with a $1600 telescope can see it and then you presented a photo taken by the $1.2B Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Satellite and I'll move onto my follow-up question. Why can a satellite launched in 2009 orbiting the moon only supply a single pixel image of something the size of the car, while Google's satellites can send me an indisputable photo of my car from space. The SR-71 built in the 1960's had cameras capable of reading a license plate from 30,000 ft in the air.
Logan Green
>yeah the evidence is fake, but it definitely happened
Imagine being this much of a retarded lunatic.
Christopher Smith
>Not even the majority
Every single footage from the moon landing was filmed on earth. The moon pictures are also taken in a studio with the use of studio lights.
James Powell
>Why can a satellite launched in 2009 orbiting the moon only supply a single pixel image of something the size of the car, while Google's satellites can send me an indisputable photo of my car from space. The SR-71 built in the 1960's had cameras capable of reading a license plate from 30,000 ft in the air.
Because you are terrible at doing math.
Thomas Diaz
They are not going to the moon. Have you seen any new moon lander? Is anything tested on video?
It will be 100x easier to fake it today than in the 1960s. They are not going to the moon.
Noah Cruz
> All over. Takes about $1,600 in equipment to get a good quality image of the different landing locations.
Try again, fucktard; not even the best equipment on earth can resolve fuck all on the lunar surface, much less some hobby shit.