1 in 150 people on earth are slaves, according to BBC. There are currently more than 4 times the slaves alive today as there were in 400 years of the Atlantic slave trade.
Why is America vilified the world over for its history with slavery, when the problem not only currently exists, but flourishes, in other countries?
Should Western governments be focusing resources on helping modern slaves, or is it not_my_problem.jpg?
It seems like the focus is always on America, and it's always America's fault whenever slavery is discussed.
>We are all slaves to the BBC Ok now with that out of the way, slavery is actually good.
Christian Cook
Until you end up having to pay reparations, as someone who was never a slave owner, to people who were never slaves, lest they burn your cities to the ground.
the only thing that has ever happened in history is black slavery, why else would blacks be uniquely incapable of functioning in society?
Samuel Sullivan
Even the trans-Atlantic trade is known to have sent over 95% of black slaves to Central & South America and the Caribbean. But it's the people who owned that other 5% who get all the attention. Why? Simply because they are white. Now, the deep and interesting reason for this phenomenon of blaming only the white race is ... white supremacy. People of all races instinctively understand that the white race is special -- somewhat god-like -- and is therefore to be held to a much higher standard than the other races.
Mason Lee
What's the solution? Is there a solution? Instead of moving forward together, the common theme is to hold whites back. Seems counterintuitive.
James Reyes
>1 in 150 people on earth are slaves, according to BBC. the real figure is 149.99 out of 150
Andrew Cox
There is a literal war between the Jewish mafia and the white race, the beginning of said war having been in the Garden of Eden. The problem now is that it's been so long, and the enemy works so subtly to erase and change memory/history, that the whites have forgotten that they are at war. All foretold in scripture. The only answer is for Yahweh/God's children (literal) to turn back to Him and His son Jesus Christ. Revelation rhetorically asks "Who can make war with the beast?" Not us on our own; that's for sure.
Jayden Collins
Interesting take. If true, it would seem like they are winning. You can't even speak the truth in Canada anymore. We don't have laws that guarantee free speech, yet, even if we did, it seems like most people are already brainwashed.
Yes, that's how it has to be. Much like when the Israelites (none of whom were "Jews" as we know that word today) were slaves in Egypt -- There was NO WAY that they were ever going to be free from that, and that's how everyone in the world around them saw the situation. The Bible even says that Yahweh/God purposely made it seem hopeless for them. Why? Well, the Bible answers that question: So that when they DID eventually escape Pharaoh, there would be no question in anyone's mind as to who or what was responsible -- YAHWEH GOD, since the situation was obviously impossible otherwise.
Isaac Long
Adam and Eve were the first white people. (But not the first people on the earth, as a close reading of Genesis will show: When Cain is expelled from the Garden, he tells Yahweh/God that other people who meet him will kill him. Cain also goes on to build a city elsewhere, etc.) Note that even the title "Genesis" contains the word "Genes". Yahweh/God even specifically says in scripture why He created Adam -- Because there was not a man to till the earth, i.e. farm -- which would be a strange way to say that there was no man on the earth. Note that white people have always been known as the best farmers (by far) and that The Garden possibly represents the invention of agriculture. Yahweh/God then goes on to say that He created Eve because there was not found a suitable mate for Adam, which again is a very strange way to say that there were no women on the earth. The truth is that there were other women on the earth, but they were not of Adam's race -- his kind, etc. And on and on. The scriptures are entirely spiritual/racial in nature, and the Bible is basically the Book of the White Race.
Many of these ideas are part of the "racist" historical and religious belief called Christian Identity (sometimes Christian Israel), for those who would be interested in learning more.
. A woman with a beautiful voice reads a paper on the subject (with nice pictures):
Also, reminder that the Middle East, Near East, and North Africa was once a land of white people. "Arab" actually means "mixture" in Hebrew -- pronounced "Ayreb" -- this word coming from a verb meaning "to grow darker" (like evening). Interestingly, the Bible records that Yahweh/God "gave" up Egypt (for example) for the sake of His people (a certain group of white people -- the descendants of the man named Jacob/Israel -- which today comprises the bulk of the white race). To whom or what did Yahweh give up Egypt? Racemixing, multiculturalism, and non-whites.
Throughout history, Jesus has always been understood to be a white man. The idea that he may not have been is a modern idea. There are no depictions of Jesus Christ prior to perhaps the 1920's which portray him as anything other than a white man. Jesus was a direct descendant of David, whom scripture describes as "ruddy" -- usually understood to mean either "rosy-cheeked" or red-headed. Jesus Christ, like all other pureblooded Israelites, was a white man, and he is the Kinsman Redeemer of the white race, the children of the Most High God.
>the Atlantic slave trade Must-know redpills about jews and their slave trade: Save and spread to normies.
Nathaniel Foster
>But it's THE JEWS who are God's people!
All throughout ancient Israelite scripture (the Bible, et. al.), God COMMANDS His people to call on Him by name (the tetragrammaton, i.e. יהוה, i.e. "Yahweh", or possibly "Jehovah", etc.), and yet religious Jews absolutely refuse to do this. Also, Jews figure their family lines through the mothers, but every genealogy in the Bible is patriarchal. Additionally, the Jews have never been "many nations", as Yahweh's chosen people were prophesied to become.
Clearly "the Jews" cannot be the same people as these Israelites of scripture, as explained in the points above, and as alluded to by Jesus Christ Himself when he said that He knew of people who claimed to be "people of the tribe of Judah" (translated as "Jews" in the KJV and elsewhere), but were not. Jesus said that these people were liars. Knowing what we know about the Jews of today, would it really be so surprising that they had in fact assumed the identity of another people, the true people of God? All the evidence says that this is the case.
The so-called "lost" northern tribes actually migrated and became the white nations of Europe. Keep in mind that most instances of the word "Jew" in the Bible are actually mistranslations by today's standards and meanings. In most cases, the word should now rather be replaced with either "Judean" (inhabitant of Judea) or "Judahite" (member of the tribe of Judah). By today's Jews impersonating first the tribe of Judah (Jesus talks about this.) and then eventually all of Israel (a people, not a place), they have turned this aspect of scripture into a mistranslation (although there are a few instances where it is not a mistranslation, such as where Jesus references the "blasphemy of those who say they are Jews but are not and do lie" (my paraphrase)).
>/end
cheers lad
Landon King
Americans are a bunch of shame driven, conformist, propagandized, conflict avoiding, cucks who hold onto this mark like its part of their identity is why. The parents allow their children to be born into it. The ex slaves should be paying reparations to their previous owners.
Owen Allen
Have you considered writing a book? Organize these sources and contextualize them and publish online.
Ryder Stewart
I'll be honest, when I started the thread I didn't see it going in this direction. But you've given me a lot to look into with an interesting perspective. Appreciated.
