Serbia and russia

russians used to call Ukraine "little russia".
But in reality serbia is "little russia".
Think about it.
A country larger than its neighbours, whom it used to dominate, that fought an unsuccessful war against NATO and ended up losing more of its territory.
I'm starting to understand why serbians support russia so much. They see themselves reflected in them.

Attached: srbru.jpg (279x181, 14.59K)

Russians never called Ukraine "Little Russia." That was a nickname given to Ukraine by the Poles and Hungarians. Russians have always called Ukraine "Ukraine" or "Malorossiya" (Little Russia).

Mind your shithole you piece of shit

>Russians never called Ukraine "Little Russia."
>Russians have always called Ukraine "Ukraine" or "Malorossiya" (Little Russia).
Go to bed, user.

>fought an unsuccessful war against NATO
nato attacked us first I don't recall Croatia joining nato 1991??

NATO intervened because you couldn't stop yourselves from killing Albanians.
It makes the nature of serbia as "little russia" that much more apparent

>NATO intervened because you couldn't stop yourselves from killing Albanians.
Albanians killed a lot of Serbs in Kosovo. Don't you know the story of organ trafficking?

yeah when we do war crimes is "illegal" when other side do war crimes is "for democracy"

Both are natural losers so it makes sense

Serbia won WW1 and WW2 (costly) and is now biggest loser of the Balkans

Russia almost won WW1 and WW2 (costly) and is now the biggest loser of Europe

zog intervened because they wanted a base in a strategic location, one of the largest deposits of water, lignite, gold, and other ores
also because serb police interrupted CIA's drug trade
you're not fooling anyone with that human rights bullshit

>whataboutism
That is exactly what russian media does.
The joke is writing itself at this point.

Attached: 1662416781447081.png (720x732, 299.38K)

Holland defeated Spain in the 17th century, but lost to England. The Netherlands lost World War II to Germany and was liberated at the same time as Germany capitulated. Also, the Netherlands has received a lot of migrants from Africa and the Middle East and has unrest in its own country. His own prime minister declared war on Dutch farmers and ordered the police to shoot the people. Who is the biggest loser then?

if nato intervention in serbia was to stop "genocide" then how do you justify croatians and albanain war crime againts serbs

>That is exactly what russian media does.
>The joke is writing itself at this point.
A pathetic response from a "democratic" country led by a "democratic" prime minister.

Attached: trudeau_hitler_castro.jpg (1800x1441, 519.14K)

I'm not. What's your point?

sorry but war crimes are funny. fuck your whataboutism. i love seeing ethnic minorities get btfo. fucking cry about it diaspora fag.

Attached: dead hanging nigger lol.jpg (474x632, 48.39K)

Yeah.

Attached: 1652009055870.jpg (500x752, 73.56K)

Based

Attached: 1659816897375802.webm (256x480, 2.89M)

so NATO intervention in Serbia is not justified and this statement is correct NATO indeed attacked us first.

Soon to be replaced by Poilievre. Democratic country and all.

NATO intervention in Serbia was absolutely justified and more civilians would have died unnecessarily if we didn't put you in your place.