The forgiving of students loans is bad... JUST BECAUSE OK!

>lack of competition and skyrocketing tuition.
You failed to mention foreign students, mostly from China and India, who will pay any price just to have a footing in a developed country.

The Fed means to collapse the economy in order to save the FRN. They'll rebuild it when you're dead.

skyrocketing tuition is due to government guaranteeing loans in the first place. colleges know they'll get money no matter what without any downside.

both are bad, you retard.

why is a potatonigger like you concerned with america?

Threadly reminder that responding to lefty strawman arguments is gayer than sucking all the dicks. Don't be a faggot.

Corporations shouldn't get bailed out in a free market.

Student loan forgiveness is stealing from the poor to give to the rich.

If the Fed wants to destroy their own economy in pursuit of a goal that they cannot achieve without one, then good.
>b-b-but muh unrealistic claims!
Don't care. They're unrealistic and silly. In the real world, collapse economy = mass violence = they all die.

Leftist, probably. Plugged into Twitter which is effectively an American echo chamber.

> gibs for jews in higher education
> gibs for corporate jews
Gibsmedats is an addiction without cure.

Attached: shrine_of_statists_web-garrison.jpg (1200x1023, 521.34K)

Whomst is this semen demon?

Education should be free...

Why?

Also, it isn't free. University is a gamble, you go to develop skills to get higher tier jobs in the market. If you don't, you're a fucking retard. Pay your own loan. The only reason these people can go and do a worthless degree is because the loan companies give loans to everyone. Which, as shown is a bad idea.

Really, what needs to happen is less people go to uni. And, those that do should go later in life.

Should we let them go bankrupt and let the students fix it?

No. Access to educational material should be free to citizens, but education itself (when carried out by professors) should be payed for. Actual skills should be valued more than a piece of paper (and this is actually practiced in more advanced and complicated fields where you can't fake your career with a paper. When you get payed to design the next cpu fab or the next low level graphics engine, you either deliver or you're out of the market).

You take out a loan, you pay it back
Simple as

Not everyone can get into university. If you got rid of the useless "electives" and focused young people towards proper career pathes, the state could easily make education very cheap, or free.

Most people wouldn't even go to university that way as well. Tech schools would be more useful.

Whataboutism. Giving money to both is bad.

yet only one is the status quo

Corporations getting bailed out is bad too

Unironically based. To hell with credentialism and people going to uni just to feel superior with worthless degrees. I would be happy if the government payed for education materials to be made available online (like GCSE materials here).

The one thing I think is awful about the USA system is that the loans can't be removed by going bankrupt. Their government did that, so I think both the Unis and state new this would happen.