Bring back pan arab nationalism

>Pretty based of you
that was always how france thought, the french republic gave full french citizenship and voting rights to genoans, rhineland germans, dutch low countries, croatians, catalonians etc

hitler never did anything like that, because he was high off nationalism, he went around mistrating other europeans who spoke a different language, even though some were the exact same race as germans
it's not a coincidence that all nations correspond 1 to 1 to the realms of kings and only 1 language is spoken on them, it's the bread and butter of mind control, ensure everyone you control speaks the same language, one that is different from everyone else, and they will be loyal to you, and willing to kill their brothers

Attached: Departements 1812.png (1027x865, 587.92K)

Nice. To me all Whites who are not anti-White or anti-my-survival are my friends and family.
Nationalism, like democracy, is designed to cause division. We only need to look at the absolute state of America after an election to see this.

Arabs are not a race. They are particularly ugly species of rapist monkeys.

bmp

>Nationalism, like democracy, is designed to cause division.
it absolutely was designed, things were a lot more healthy as far as relations between europeans were concerned during the middle ages, not because middle ages europe wasn't a shithole, but because nationalism hadn't been invented as a tool by the rulers and governements yet

before that, every region in europe spoke a slightly different language, wars were fought between mercenaries (and sometimes slave levied soldiers), you never had something like an entire ethnicity hating another (except for the turks and mongols kek, everyone hated those)

Austria is the perfect example of what happens when a country doesn't use nationalism and language as a weapon to brainwash their population, if the austrian kaisers had forced everyone in the austrian empire to speak austrian, while at the same time modifying austrian so that it would become more different from other dialects of german, then the nation that was austria hungary would still be on the maps today
even the action of renaming the austrian empire to the austrian hungarian double monarchy was a terrible idea, they did that to quell the unhappyness of the hungarian populations, but in so doing made sure that the nation would eventually split at the language line
even if a treaty like trioanon had happened, if everyone spoke the same language, austria hungary would have reformed, language is an extremely powerful brainwashing tool, that's why for exmaple the british rulers make sure to exterminate every language other than english on the british isles, that was a very good move for them, because more than likely, the UK including ireland could reform in the future, just because irish normies will feel kinship with other english speakers, just because of language

the only silver lining is that while nationalism and language completely destroys the minds of normies, history has shown it's possible to erase nations from collective memory, that, sadly, is the only path forward for anyone who wishes to see europe a nation, all the languages of europe will need to be eradicated and replaced by one unified language if that is to ever happen, or else it will fall appart and explode into it's previous "nations" after a short time

Silence dhimmi

The Shah's Iran was an israeli puppet state. The SAVAK secret police were trained by mossad.

>easy going Islam of the past
Someone doesn't know why the Abbasid revolution happened.

>women dressed like whore
>women can't do that nw or else they die unironically
Seems like an improvement to me.

>The Shah's Iran was an israeli puppet state. The SAVAK secret police were trained by mossad.
Source? I thought they hated each other more than anyone else on earth (my source is the iranian ambassador to france)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAVAK
>It was established by Mohammad Reza Shah with the help of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Mossad
washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/12/13/savak-jails-stark-reminder-of-shahs-rule/b2b37be2-356a-43e2-ba68-dd474e9023b0/
>Star witness Hassan Sana worked for 23 years in SAVAK service and ended up as a key advisor to its director for security, economics and prison affairs.
>Among the intelligence services with which SAVAK exchanged information -- as often as not receiving in return information about anti-shah students abroad -- were those of the United States, Israel, Britain, France, West Germany, Pakistan, Egypt "and to some extent" Iraq, and "a little with Turkey, he said.
>"Joint activities," however, were limited, he said, to the Cia and Israel's Mossad. The Israelis even wrote SAVAK's manuals and, he said, prepared an ill-fated effort last year to undermine the growing religious impact of the revolution.
iranian.com/2018/05/01/israels-mossad-tutored-savak-torture-according-cia-officials/
>Volume 11 of this series focused on Israel and its relationship with the brutal regime of Iran under the Shah. You can read it for free in English online at the Internet Archive. The larger portion of the book is taken up by a CIA study on the nature and structure of Israeli intelligence services.
>As the Cockburns points out, the spy agencies of Iran under the Shah, Israel and Turkey formed an alliance known as the Trident Organisation. This “formal trilateral liaison” was “established by Mossad with Turkey’s National Security Services (TNSS) and Iran’s National Organisation for Intelligence and Security (SAVAK) in late 1958.”
archive.org/stream/DocumentsFromTheUSEspionageDen/Documents from the U.S. Espionage Den v11#page/n63/mode/2up

>en.wikipedia.org
that's the least trustworthy source on earth probably

>>As the Cockburns points out, the spy agencies of Iran under the Shah, Israel and Turkey formed an alliance known as the Trident Organisation. This “formal trilateral liaison” was “established by Mossad with Turkey’s National Security Services (TNSS) and Iran’s National Organisation for Intelligence and Security (SAVAK) in late 1958.”
that one seems plausible, source included, but all it says is that there was a local middle eastern alliance where the already existing savak was involved, not that israel created them

and that wouldn't be too surprising, because back then Iraq was a big enemy of iran, there even was a whole iraq-iran war, turkey+israel+iran in the 1950s seems like an anti iraqi alliance network, jumping from that to "israel did the iranian revolution" is quite a big leap, especially since it's not the 50s anymore, iraq is gone, and they're no longer friendly to each other at all

>israel did the iranian revolution
Are you retarded? The Islamic Revolution was anti-Israel. The shah was (re)installed by the CIA. Iran was an ally of Israel and the US under the Shah. Arch kike Kissinger set them up with Israel.
timesofisrael.com/a-generation-ago-israelis-found-paradise-in-iran/
history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v27/ch1