Who would the military be loyal to, if it came to that - Parliament or the King? Let's not discuss how impossible it is and pretend it happens.
Who would the military be loyal to, if it came to that - Parliament or the King...
Jaxson Jones
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
myredditnudes.com
twitter.com
Anthony Smith
Whichever side loves jews, niggers, and shitskins more
Levi Stewart
Realistically they'd bow to king. Bongs genuinely respect the throne even if they hate it. The real problem would be MI6 glowniggers.
Asher Bell
They swear an oath to the King so
(Here’s a scene from a film where Charles dissolves parliament and goes full fash)
Cooper Baker
Doesn't matter. Jews would assassinate him instantly with a drone.
Lincoln Miller
For the King always, politicians are gay faggots who don't matter
Lucas Davis
This is the reality
Thomas Jackson
If politics ever got to be enough of a shitshow that they had to make the choice, it's difficult to say.
Ultimately the military swears allegiance to the king though and if an elected official was forcing a constitutional crisis they'd probably choose the king. If the king was trying to seize control of the country though they'd probably choose parliment.
Christopher Sanchez
oh wow, gonna download that now
Lincoln Cox
Asher Gomez
If the king was a strong young man, who made deft political maneuvers to gain the allegiance of the army, he could take command of the government. But instead you have these old ass fossils who are just living tourist attractions.
Elijah Morgan
That's an answer that basically says "it depends lol". Is there no certainty?
Sebastian Wright
One single person should never have total control.
A lot of “mad” kings ruled in the past with no one to contest their decisions. Hopefully King Charles III doesn’t go mad.
Jackson Scott
>Is there no certainty?
No because at the moment it's not even within the realm of possibility for the two to come into conflict.
In order for them to even come into conflict something big would have to change and the side they would support basically depends on what form that change takes.
Jordan Wright
History, mostly. Same reason Americans at one point may be willing to fight for a piece of paper, because that piece of paper represents the hard fought battles of our ancestors.
We're becoming too brown for such altruistic values.
Ryder Collins
The military would side with Isreal first
Eli Perry
Interesting, I get your point.
Ryan Jackson
They army will always fight for the King or Queen
Xavier Russell
wherever the paycheck comes from
Jackson Sullivan
would the king give them something to fight for?
people need to understand what the TRUE purpose of a monarch is. Its supposed to represent a constant and hope. Like light house to a sailor at sea. King charles III doesnt give that impression. It would have been better for him to abdicate and give it to William who is more beloved in England and globally.
Nathan Parker
Humans are symbolic creatures
Parker Walker
Yes.
t. still having problems with subhuman homosexual jews after 5 years trying to expose their faggy shadow caliphate
Leo Howard
the parliament too
Matthew Hughes
>Hopefully King Charles III doesn’t go mad.
He has no ability or power to rule, he is just a figure head he can only tarnish or polish the image of monarchy and in these times i could be fatal.
Dude is too uppercrusty and stiff im afraid.
Kevin Baker
parliament who actually pay these wages