Why is there so much art of naked boys in history?

Why is there so much art of naked boys in history?

Attached: Cupid_with_golden_wings-Louis_Schroeder-RF_1116-IMG_0973-white.jpg (6000x6000, 3.36M)

Other urls found in this thread:

greek-love.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

MOOOOODS

>history
>sees naked boys

Found the fag. Neck yourself, OP.

Possible
I do see them in rich neighborhoods

Because they symbolize the innocence of man, untouched by the corruption of women.

Because boys are hot, and pederasty is based and was normal historically: greek-love.com/

Attached: pederasty.jpg (1040x3350, 3.48M)

Attached: pedopals222222.jpg (1599x1200, 562.46K)

It represents the innocence of men. Is it really a mystery? All men were once boys. Only fags have impure thoughts.

Quiet, homo

because people were more in tune with consciousness in the past, so could appreciate the beauty and energy from that art, without immediately bluntly yelling "FAG!" and then dancing around like a gorilla nigger.

Yeah this isn't gay at all

Attached: 395642_original.jpg (600x800, 170.53K)

>Implying these people had secret rooms filled with terrabytes of exploitive black market porn

because what we understand about beauty is heavily influenced by the body and its perfect form.

you think little boys are gay? what are you, a groomer?

Because they liked fucking little boys. One of the stories in Greek Mythology is Zeus turning into a giant eagle and kidnapping a twink.

Attached: Andr22.jpg (512x600, 48.04K)

It's just to appreciate physical beauty and fitness. If someone sees anything wrong with it, they must be fags themselves.

Attached: 1646256787884.jpg (1132x1150, 160.55K)

>implying child pornography is exploitative when it's literally the exact opposite
Commercially produced child pornography was all consensual, and the children were payed for their involvement. Nowadays the majority of child pornography is produced and distributed by children themselves.
Child porn was legal to produce and distribute until 1982 and legal to possess until 1996. You could buy magazines like pic rel. from street vendors in the 1970s.

Attached: Boy_Cover.jpg (1472x1039, 275.73K)

Yeah this isn't gay at all

Attached: EvQoKvTXEAQ1xXT.jpg (736x1104, 70.79K)

If you see a sculpture and see “gay”, you’re the fag.

Attached: 1.jpg (1387x1080, 567.07K)

Do you think the shotacon genre was created after burgers nuked nips into creating anime? Nope. This genre has existed since the dawn of time, and all these statues and paintings of naked little boys were requested by wealthy shotafags for their private enjoyment, similar to how commission shota porn online. History demonstrates that shotas are the wealthy man's fetish.

Attached: painting of a wealthy fujo with her shota OC.jpg (1167x1815, 285.43K)

So you're telling me, with a straight face, that spending weeks or even months meticulously sculpting a little boy's penis isn't even 0.01% gay?

That is disgusting, but I'm not sure what point you're trying to make