OK so you all always post this meme on the rightwing and I see it and you all think it's some big conspiracy but there's actually a very simple reason for this.
In 2010, right before the American media seemingly started focusing on identity politics so much, right-wingers brought a lawsuit against the FEC related to campaign finance and funding and donations. The organization was Citizens United. They won the case on the basis of their "free speech for the wealthy" and "muh free markets" bullshit that rightwingers always purvey, and the result was that ever since then corporations have been able to donate nearly unrestricted to political causes
So because they're corporations and they want to protect capitalism, and make people vote for the rightwing to cut their taxes and deregulate them, they have since donated to causes that promote identity politics. They want people to be divided by race, gender and sexuality.
You're all guilty of this here on this board. And on the rightwing. You are the side of identity politics, so you're the side most explicitly guilty of this
But their goal is to avoid socialism and leftwing government that wouldn't let them be as rich and powerful as they want. The only way to stop this is to turn your back on your "muh free speech for rich people" bullshit, and your "muh free market" bullshit, and ultimately really abolish capitalism (which for those of you who are uneducated, which is nearly all of you, that means abolishing the private ownership of large industries)
Um you can read more about Citizen's United vs the FCC here if you want. It's not "the jews" and the usual boogeyman rightwing bullshit you make up, it was just you people. Your rightwing politics and rightwing causes: >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
>Ok so Pic related is irrefutable, ironclad, undeniable, no jew has the balls to come to my thread and attempt to refute it.
Laughable excuses for arguments kikes have tried >jews are white >the holocaust was white on white violence >whites were just too heckin slow!!! at saving jews from TOTAL, COMPLETE ERRADICATION >jews are entitled to subvert and destroy the host nations that saved them from TOTAL ERADICATION because... just because!!! >jews don't identify, associate themselves with, nor do they care about the holocaust >jews actually like the goyim. >yeah I hate goyim, so what? >jews lack all agency and do not possess malicious intent nor are they aware of their own actions due to all the propaganda they have consumed; propaganda created by other jews with malicious intent >The Jew has never received any financial, moral, or military support from their host nations post-WWII and all they have today was gained through hard work and the solidarity of the tribe. This lack of support justifies their treatment and lack of gratitude towards the goyim post-WWII >The actions of the Allied Nations and the result of those actions which we can be verified through history do not matter. Only the intentions and FEELINGS of the liberators matter both which are things that are impossible to prove one way or another.
>Assuming the holocaust happened why does the jew attack their liberators? >Because Hitler was right about the jew
>Or alternatively >If Hitler was wrong about the jew, then why does the jew feel no remorse or guilt about attacking their liberators, unless of course the holocaust never happened. If the holocaust never happened and is a lie orchestrated by jews to subvert and destroy goyim nations... >Thus Hitler was right about the jew.
there is no real distinction between the government, banks and big corporations now. This isnt the free market, this is closer to socialism, but not even socialism. They dont want real capitalism and they dont want real socialism, they want things just the way they are because they can take advantage if obscurity
It's socialism for the rich. Are you poor and broke? Fuck off. Are you rich? Here's trillions of dollars printed from nothing, don't spend it all in one place! Rinse and repeat.
Xavier Lee
I hate morons like you so much
Yes there is a distinction between private entites and public ones, you fucking idiot. Private entities are privately owned. Banks and corporations are privately owned and operated for the profit of rich people. Government is not.
Oh my god, fuck you so hard for your rightwing ignorance
And "capitalism" and "socialism" have nothing to do with "free markets" and your other insane ignorant libertarian shit.
"Capitalism" means your industry is privately owned. By rich people. Like it is in America because, fucking moron, you live under capitalism.
"Socialism" would mean that your industry is not privately owned, but publicly owned. Everyone would have a stake in them and they'd be operated for public good. Like a post office, or a library or a fire station. Those are really the only examples of "socialism" in American society
You utterly fucking libertarian idiot
James Rogers
How would you regulate donations to political campaigns, OP? What about movies made in favor of a candidate independent of the campaign? I agree there are corruption problems at play here, but how do you square that with free speech?
Benjamin Diaz
Yeah there's no such thing as "socialism for the rich" idiot. You just live under capitalism. Your industry is privately owned instead of collectively owned by The People. You live under capitalism, moron. And it's not a debate and everyone knows it's not a debate except uneducated idiots on Any Forums and on the rightwing who are just stupid fucking people. Just literally the clueless and fucking stupid people of the planet Earth
