Do bongs actually support the existence of the monarchy or no? I know the members have little to no say in modern government but nonetheless do you support the idea?
Do bongs actually support the existence of the monarchy or no...
There is zero reason to support it today unless you truly do worship Kardashian reality TV shit
Monarchy is the only acceptable form of government.
I'm questioning brits, not you. Keep your mouth shut you subhuman shitskin.
Shut the fuck up faggot do you know where you are this isn't your reddit tab
Monarchy = tourism = money.
I'm a Royalist - Just not for the current Monarchy
yes, its culture
A lot of working class people don't like the royals, myself included.
King out Kangz in huh?
elaborate if you would
So what are your plans for deposing of your current royals? Carving their eyes out with your spoon?
The question is meaningless to them, Britsharts don’t have free will.
wat?
and your answer is meaningless to me. I ask only for the input of the "subjects", not of a foreigner such as yourself.
Actually she was also the Queen of Australia.
King Charles I did nothing wrong
WAS, as in past tense. Neither she nor the english government currently have control over the affairs of your country.
user she was the queen of australia until the moment of her death. Now charles is the king of australia. The bong royal family rules over many countries.
The "english government"? Do you perhaps mean the British government? Are you suggesting the British government has no control over Britain?
yeah
our culture > your skinskin conspiracy theories from a country that invented cuck porn
we are still the majority people in our county unlike americans
something must be working
The royal family may have recognition in Australia however Australia still functions as an independent country with its own separate government that has its own representatives
>The royal family may have recognition in Australia however Australia still functions as an independent country with its own separate government that has its own representatives
No shit
Checked.
But he lost his head and the civil war.
Charles II restored the Crown but at s great cost in the long run to the monarch's power.
I see history doing what it has done under the first two Charles.
the queen is dead!
long live the queen!
also
f
Oliver Cromwell disagrees. Charles I was a spolied twat.
The real one who did nothing wrong is King Richard III.
>The real one who did nothing wrong is King Richard III
Based
A government that still had the queen as its head of state. It was her governmnet every bit as much as the one in britian.