Would I be happier if I supported communism?
Would I be happier if I supported communism?
Nathan Adams
Other urls found in this thread:
it.m.wikipedia.org
fr.m.wikipedia.org
fr.m.wikipedia.org
de.m.wikipedia.org
de.m.wikipedia.org
fr.m.wikipedia.org
jstor.org
jstor.org
merriam-webster.com
twitter.com
Luke Reed
No, but you would if you supported the Third Universal theory.
Leo Evans
Depends on whether you're smart enough to debunk the Labor Theory of Value.
Joseph Long
Not really. Communists are almost never happy themselves.
Colton Lee
>happier
no, you'd just be on more drugs
Jonathan Clark
GREAT EQUALIZER IS THE DEATH
Joshua Hall
Well, I know what the "Marginalist Theory of Value" is, does that count?
John Ward
No. The cornerstone of Communism is the LTV. If you can't see anything wrong with the LTV, then you'll probably be happy with communism. The bad news is that you probably ate paint chips as a kid.
Jace Gomez
>If you can't see anything wrong with the LTV
But I can, Marginalism was what ultimately proved it wrong.
Lincoln Ross
It didn't take a theory to prove it wrong. Simple practice proved it wrong. You can spend 40 hours making a mud pie, but all that work created something of zero value. Furthermore, labor can destroy value, such as taking apples, sugar, and dough, each already valuable, attempting to make a pie, but putting it in the oven at 400 degrees for 24 hours, turning the ingredients into a pile of ash.
Landon Reyes
no. gulid non marxian socialism/distributism is ideal
Henry Lopez
marxian ltv can be debunked.
non-marxian ltv is much better to support.
Cooper Bell
In theory you would be just as happy as every other communist. In practice it depends on how much you enjoy bread lines.
Levi Sanders
>t didn't take a theory to prove it wrong
What you've written is literally a theory.
Explain
Jaxon Ramirez
>What you've written is literally a theory.
No. All of that is literally proof that the LTV falls flat on its face. Work does not inherently create value, and its so blatant that a 5 year old could see it.
Joshua Price
>All of that is literally proof that the LTV falls flat on its face
And it's almost like if you formalize that proof you create a theory.
Austin Turner
it.m.wikipedia.org
fr.m.wikipedia.org
distributism
fr.m.wikipedia.org
de.m.wikipedia.org
Carolingian Renaissance
de.m.wikipedia.org
Ottonian Renaissance
fr.m.wikipedia.org
Corporation under the Kingdom of France
jstor.org
Liana Vardi
jstor.org
The Abolition of the Guilds during the French Revolution
Austin Allen
No, that's not what a theory is. A theory is a hypothisis, a guess, if you will. It still needs to be proven, which is why its not a Law.
Wyatt Miller
No, a hypothesis needs to be proven.
It becomes a theory when ti is proven.
Laws only apply to math.
James Martin
You're predictable, which is why I had this ready for you.
Eli Foster
Mutt education
Jackson Davis
>synonyms
Only in common speak, not formally
merriam-webster.com