Pic related is irrefutable, undeniable, no kike has the balls to come to my thread and attempt to refute it.
Laughable excuses for arguments kikes have tried >jews are white >the holocaust was white on white violence >whites were just too heckin slow!!! at saving jews from TOTAL, COMPLETE ERRADICATION >jews are entitled to subvert and destroy the host nations that saved them from TOTAL ERADICATION because... just because!!! >jews don't identify, associate themselves with, nor do they care about the holocaust >jews actually like the goyim. >yeah I hate goyim, so what? >jews lack all agency and do not possess malicious intent nor are they aware of their own actions due to all the propaganda they have consumed, propaganda created by other jews with malicious intent
Doesn't matter The Allies could have went into WW2 with the intention of slaughtering every jew everywhere and the end result will always remain the same if you believe the holocaust mythos. The end result being that jews were saved from TOTAL, COMPLETE ERRADICATION, EXTINCTION, ANNIHILATION. That should warrant gratitude, instead you see how they treated their host nations post WW2 and even today.
yes he is. or he's a kike. either way don't worry about him, he will literally be defeated the failure of his own thinking
Zachary Torres
proofs are conclusions that are directly drawn from a set of premises. your conclusions do not follow your premises. you are committing multiple leap to conclusion fallacies, strawman fallacies, petitio principii fallacy, post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, and a false dilemma fallacy.
Christian Garcia
>jews attack their liberators >therefore the holohoax never happened This is an incoherent leap to conclusion. The conclusion is NOT drawn from the premise.